• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Adam Morton
(1945 - 2020)

PhD: Princeton UniversityLast affiliation: University of British Columbia
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    227
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    2
  •  News and Updates
    184

 More details
  • University of British Columbia
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor (Part-time)
Princeton University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1971
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology
Philosophy of Mind
Abduction and Other Minds
Other Minds, Misc
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Philosophy of Language
General Philosophy of Science
Possible-World Theories of Counterfactuals
Causal Theories of Counterfactuals
Indicative vs Subjunctive Conditionals
Subjunctive Conditionals, Misc
Abduction and Other Minds
Other Minds, Misc
4 more
  • All publications (227)
  •  1427
    Complex individuals and multigrade relations
    Noûs 9 (3): 309-318. 1975.
    I relate plural quantification, and predicate logic where predicates do not need a fixed number of argument places, to the part-whole relation. For more on these themes see later work by Boolos, Lewis, and Oliver & Smiley.
    Nonclassical LogicsPlural Quantification
  •  980
    Human bounds: rationality for our species
    Synthese 176 (1). 2010.
    Is there such a thing as bounded rationality? I first try to make sense of the question, and then to suggest which of the disambiguated versions might have answers. We need an account of bounded rationality that takes account of detailed contingent facts about the ways in which human beings fail to perform as we might ideally want to. But we should not think in terms of rules or norms which define good responses to an individual's limitations, but rather in terms of desiderata, situations that l…Read more
    Is there such a thing as bounded rationality? I first try to make sense of the question, and then to suggest which of the disambiguated versions might have answers. We need an account of bounded rationality that takes account of detailed contingent facts about the ways in which human beings fail to perform as we might ideally want to. But we should not think in terms of rules or norms which define good responses to an individual's limitations, but rather in terms of desiderata, situations that limited agents can hope to achieve, and corresponding virtues of achieving them. We should not take formal theories defining optimal behavior in watered-down bounded form, even though they can impose enormous computational or cognitive demands
    RationalityHope
  •  51
    Scotomas and the visual field
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3): 456. 1983.
  •  573
    Colour appearances and the colour solid
    In Andrew Harrison (ed.), Philosophy And The Visual Arts, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1987.
    Color
  •  109
    The reality of the symbolic and subsymbolic systems
    with Andrew Woodfield
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1): 58-58. 1988.
  •  1561
    Folk Psychology
    In Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind, Oxford University Press. 2007.
    I survey the previous 20 years work on the nature of folk psychology, with particular emphasis on the original debate between theory theorists and simulation theorists, and the positions that have emerged from this debate.
    Epistemology of Mind, MiscThe Nature of Folk Psychology
  •  1
    Review of Bratman *Acting Together* (review)
    Agency, Misc
  •  108
    Benacerraf and His Critics (edited book)
    with Stephen P. Stich
    Blackwell. 1996.
    a collection of articles by philosophers of mathematics on themes associated with the work of Paul Benacceraf
    Philosophy of Mathematics, General Works
  •  885
    The Variety of Rationality
    with David Holdcroft
    Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 59 (1): 139-176. 1985.
    I discuss the connections between rationality and intentional action, emphasising that different kinds of action are rational an intentional in different ways.
    RationalityRationality and Cognitive Science
  •  9
    Partisanship
    In Brian P. McLaughlin & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Perspectives on Self-Deception, University of California Press. pp. 170-182. 1988.
    I argue that to have a chance of acquiring valuable beliefs one must take a risk of self-deception.
    Ethics of Belief
  •  1055
    Contrastive knowledge
    with Antti Karjalainen
    Philosophical Explorations 6 (2). 2003.
    We describe the three place relation of contrastive knowledge, which holds between a person, a target proposition, and a contrasting proposition. The person knows that p rather than that q. We argue for three claims about this relation. (a) Many common sense and philosophical ascriptions of knowledge can be understood in terms of it. (b) Its application is subject to fewer complications than non-contrastive knowledge is. (c) It applies over a wide range of human and nonhuman cases.
    Epistemological Theories, MiscEpistemological States and PropertiesContext and Context-DependenceEpi…Read more
    Epistemological Theories, MiscEpistemological States and PropertiesContext and Context-DependenceEpistemic Contrastivism
  •  915
    The Presidential Address: Where Demonstratives Meet Vagueness: Possible Languages
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1). 1999.
    I present three invented languages, in order to support a claim that vagueness and demonstrativity are related. One of them handles vagueness like English handles demonstratives, the second handles demonstratives like English handles vagueness, and the third combines the resources of the first two. The argument depends on the claim that all three can be learned and used by anyone who can speak English.
    Vagueness and IndeterminacyEvolution of LanguagePhilosophy of Language, General WorksLinguistic Comm…Read more
    Vagueness and IndeterminacyEvolution of LanguagePhilosophy of Language, General WorksLinguistic CommunicationTheories of VaguenessTheories of Vagueness, MiscDemonstratives, Misc
  •  173
    Emotion and Imagination
    Polity. 2013.
    I argue that on an understanding of imagination that relates it to an individual's environment rather than her mental contents imagination is essential to emotion, and brings together affective, cognitive, and representational aspects to emotion. My examples focus on morally important emotions, especially retrospective emotions such as shame, guilt, and remorse, which require that one imagine points of view on one's own actions. PUBLISHER'S BLURB: Recent years have seen an enormous amount of phi…Read more
    I argue that on an understanding of imagination that relates it to an individual's environment rather than her mental contents imagination is essential to emotion, and brings together affective, cognitive, and representational aspects to emotion. My examples focus on morally important emotions, especially retrospective emotions such as shame, guilt, and remorse, which require that one imagine points of view on one's own actions. PUBLISHER'S BLURB: Recent years have seen an enormous amount of philosophical research into the emotions and the imagination, but as yet little work has been done to connect the two. In his engaging and highly original new book, Adam Morton shows that all emotions require some form of imagination and goes on to fully explore the link between these two important concepts both within philosophy and in everyday life. We may take it for granted that complex emotions, such as hope and resentment, require a rich thinking and an engagement with the imagination, but Morton shows how more basic and responsive emotions such as fear and anger also require us to take account of possibilities and opportunities beyond the immediate situation. Interweaving a powerful tapestry of subtle argument with vivid detail, the book highlights that many emotions, more than we tend to suppose, require us to imagine a situation from a particular point of view and that this in itself can be the source of further emotional feeling. Morton goes on to demonstrate the important role that emotions play in our moral lives, throwing light on emotions such as self-respect, disapproval, and remorse, and the price we pay for having them. He explores the intricate nature of moral emotions and the challenges we face when integrating our thinking on morality and the emotions. This compelling and thought-provoking new book challenges many assumptions about the nature of emotion and imagination and will appeal to anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the role that these concepts play in our lives. The book also has far reaching implications that will spark debate amongst scholars and students for some time to come.
    Moral Emotion, MiscTheories of Emotion, MiscMoral Emotivism and Sentimentalism
  •  81
    Lore-Abiding People
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3): 601-606. 2001.
    I evaluate Kusch's arguments that everyday and scientific psychological beliefs are made true by the institutional facts about the people to whom they are applied. I conclude that institutional facts are among the truth-makers of such beliefs, and that this is a very significant point to have made, but that they are unlikely to be the sole such truth-makers.
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsEpistemology of Mind, MiscConcepts of Other MindsOther Minds, MiscPra…Read more
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsEpistemology of Mind, MiscConcepts of Other MindsOther Minds, MiscPratical Reason, Misc
  •  1158
    Shared Knowledge from Individual Vice: the role of unworthy epistemic emotions
    Philosophical Inquiries. 2014.
    This paper begins with a discussion the role of less-than-admirable epistemic emotions in our respectable, indeed admirable inquiries: nosiness, obsessiveness, wishful thinking, denial, partisanship. The explanation for their desirable effect is Mandevillian: because of the division of epistemic labour individual epistemic vices can lead to shared knowledge. In fact it is sometimes essential to it.
    Rationality, Misc
  •  1236
    10 The evolution of strategic thinking
    In Peter Carruthers & Andrew Chamberlain (eds.), Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition, Cambridge University Press. pp. 218. 2000.
    I discuss ways in which innate human psychology facilitates the quasi-game-theoretical reasoning required for group life.
    Epistemology of Mind, MiscSocial Epistemology, Miscellaneous
  •  921
    Collective Rationality and Collective Reasoning
    Philosophical Review 112 (1): 118-120. 2003.
    McMahon's connections between collective reasoning and collective action are real and important. I suspect that they do not go deep enough, and that far more that we usually classify as individual is in fact collective.
    RationalityReasons, MiscThe Nature of ReasoningCollective ActionMental Actions
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback