• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Adam Morton
(1945 - 2020)

PhD: Princeton UniversityLast affiliation: University of British Columbia
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    227
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    2
  •  News and Updates
    184

 More details
  • University of British Columbia
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor (Part-time)
Princeton University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1971
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology
Philosophy of Mind
Abduction and Other Minds
Other Minds, Misc
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Philosophy of Language
General Philosophy of Science
Possible-World Theories of Counterfactuals
Causal Theories of Counterfactuals
Indicative vs Subjunctive Conditionals
Subjunctive Conditionals, Misc
Abduction and Other Minds
Other Minds, Misc
4 more
  • All publications (227)
  •  926
    Collective Rationality and Collective Reasoning
    Philosophical Review 112 (1): 118-120. 2003.
    McMahon's connections between collective reasoning and collective action are real and important. I suspect that they do not go deep enough, and that far more that we usually classify as individual is in fact collective.
    RationalityReasons, MiscThe Nature of ReasoningCollective ActionMental Actions
  •  81
    Lore-Abiding People
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3): 601-606. 2001.
    I evaluate Kusch's arguments that everyday and scientific psychological beliefs are made true by the institutional facts about the people to whom they are applied. I conclude that institutional facts are among the truth-makers of such beliefs, and that this is a very significant point to have made, but that they are unlikely to be the sole such truth-makers.
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsEpistemology of Mind, MiscConcepts of Other MindsOther Minds, MiscPra…Read more
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsEpistemology of Mind, MiscConcepts of Other MindsOther Minds, MiscPratical Reason, Misc
  •  2953
    Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind
    Philosophical Review 91 (2): 299. 1982.
    I assess Churchland's views on folk psychology and conceptual thinking, with particular emphasis on the connection between these topics.
    Standard Scientific RealismEliminative Materialism
  •  835
    Contractarianism and Rational Choice
    Philosophical Books 34 (3): 177-179. 1993.
    Theory in Economics
  •  1053
    Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason, Ruth Chang (ed.), Harvard university press, 1998, 303 pages (review)
    Economics and Philosophy 16 (1): 147-174. 2000.
    review of Ruth Chang's collection in which I argue that the apparent agreements between the authors disguise underlying important differences.
    Measurement in EconomicsEconomics and Ethics, MiscDecisionDesire and ReasonDesire and Motivation
  •  463
    Reply to Willing
    Dialogue 13 (3): 579. 1974.
    I reply to Willing's criticism of my 'if I were a dry well-made match', and along the way uncover a puzzle about counterfactuals rather like Geach's donkey sentence problem
    Specific Expressions
  •  115
    [Book review] mind in action, essays in the philosophy of mind (review)
    Ethics 102 (4): 844-. 1992.
    Richard RortyValue Theory, Miscellaneous
  •  68
    What is rank?
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4): 585-585. 1998.
    The concept of rank is not a very clear one. Claims that two concepts occupy the same rank in different domains are in danger of being unintelligible. Examples show how hard it is to understand Atran's claim that the most significant concepts in folk biology occur at a higher level than nonbiological concepts. A reformulation preserves some of what Atran wants to claim.
    Philosophy of Cognitive Science
  •  776
    Hypercomparatives
    Synthese 111 (1): 97-114. 1997.
    In natural language we rarely use relation-words with more than three argument places. This paper studies one systematic device, rooted in natural language, by which relations of greater adicity can be expressed. It is based on a higher-order relation between 1-place, 2-place, and 4-place relations (and so on) of which the relation between the positive and comparative degrees of a predicate is a special case. Two formal languages are presented in this connection, one of which represents the lang…Read more
    In natural language we rarely use relation-words with more than three argument places. This paper studies one systematic device, rooted in natural language, by which relations of greater adicity can be expressed. It is based on a higher-order relation between 1-place, 2-place, and 4-place relations (and so on) of which the relation between the positive and comparative degrees of a predicate is a special case. Two formal languages are presented in this connection, one of which represents the language of communication and the other the contextual information against which the first language is interpreted. A semantical theory is described, which treats the two languages in an interdependent way. Logical consequence is non-compact. Connections with issues about vagueness are made.
    Specific Expressions, Misc
  •  974
    Abstracts of Comments: The Saturation of Dyspepsia: Comments on Wilson
    Noûs 12 (1). 1978.
    Wilson argued that since for continuants such as people a predicate and a time determine a place, natural language *can* specify just, e,.g. "a is dyspeptic at t" leaving the location of a's dyspepsia unstated. From this he concludes that language *must* leave the location unstated. I query the transition from *may* to *must*.
    Philosophy of Language, Misc
  •  337
    The qualities of good experiments: Allan Franklin: What makes a good experiment? Reasons and roles in science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016, 372+viiipp, $55 HB
    Metascience 25 (3): 443-446. 2016.
    This is a very useful sourcebook of classic experiments, giving enough detail to show what is going on in each of them but discussing enough separate experiments that one can see a variety of experimental virtues. Franklin's attention to detail and his epistemological caution inhibit him from tackling some more adventurous questions. On what range of topics can we hope for evidence that is as convincing as this? Do essential aspects of experiment vary from one discipline to another?
    Philosophy of Physical Science
  •  60
    Felosophy
    Cogito 11 (2): 129-131. 1997.
    a lightweight discussion of metaphysics created by cats
    Metaphilosophical Skepticism
  •  555
    Peter Smith, "Realism and the Progress of Science" (review)
    Philosophical Quarterly 32 (28): 288. 1982.
    I describe Smith's very modest aims and argue that there is an over-expenditure of sophisticated philosophy of language to defend a common sense realism about relatively recent science.
    The Miracle Argument for Scientific Realism
  •  959
    Review: John L. Pollock: Thinking About Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making (review)
    Mind 117 (467): 716-719. 2008.
    a review of John Pollock's *Thinking about Acting* with a focus on his aim of describing psychological mechanisms which are humanly feasible.
    Computationalism in Cognitive ScienceDecisionRational RequirementsDeliberationInstrumental Reasoning
  •  70
    The Language of Thought (review)
    Journal of Philosophy 75 (3): 161-169. 1978.
    Philosophy of Cognitive Science, Miscellaneous
  •  632
    Did Lewis Carroll Write Genesis?
    Cogito 2 (1): 12-15. 1988.
    I discuss the intelligibility of belief in God, presenting a neo-positivist view. It is aimed at a non-professional audience.
    Methodology in Metaphysics
  •  934
    Mathematical Modelling and Contrastive Explanation
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (Supplement): 251-270. 1990.
    Mathematical models provide explanations of limited power of specific aspects of phenomena. One way of articulating their limits here, without denying their essential powers, is in terms of contrastive explanation.
    Scientific Practice, MiscTheories of Explanation, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback