S Liu

The philosophical Framework of modern physics puts forward a philosophical solution to the contradiction between relativity theory and quantum mechanics theory, aiming to break through the restriction of material philosophy on human thought and solve the artificial contradiction generated by material philosophy. This scheme is the physical principle of natural philosophy. Newton discovered the mathematical principles of natural philosophy, he expressed the principles of the universe’s natural philosophy through mathematics, discovering universal gravitation, the mutual perception and motion of material mass. This line of thought continued with the discovery of electromagnetism by Faraday and Maxwell, and quantum mechanics by Einstein, Planck, Born, Bohr, and Dirac many scientists. This represents the completion of the great natural theology of the universe, a credit to these great scientists. However, we have not recognized this as natural theology. Newton and Leibniz jointly discovered absolute space, but due to insufficient scientific information, we lost an opportunity. Today, modern physics has given us another chance; by combining scientific information with the Cosmic origin principles left by our ancestors, we can understand absolute space. Starting with an analysis of the “theoretical contradictions” in quantum mechanics and relativity, reflecting on the concept and essence of physics, and recognizing the Cosmic origin principle is the natural philosophy principle of physics.

Fanconi anemia (FA) is generally classified as a DNA repair disorder, conferring a genetic predisposition to cancer and prominent bone marrow failure (BMF) in early childhood. Corroborative human and murine studies point to a fetal origin of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) attrition under replicative stress. Along with intriguing recent insights into non‐canonical roles and domain‐specific functions of FA proteins, these studies have raised the possibility of a DNA repair‐independent BMF etiology. However, deeper mechanistic insight is critical as current curative options of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and emerging gene therapy have limited eligibility, carry significant side effects, and involve complex procedures restricted to resource‐rich environments. To develop rational and broadly accessible therapies for FA patients, the field will need more faithful disease models that overcome the scarcity of patient samples, leverage technological advances, and adopt investigational clinical trial designs tailored for rare diseases.

For Paul Auster, a room is in essence “the substance of solitude itself”, a spatially defined solitude. In this respect, the phenomenon has transcended its physical limitations and assumed existential and philosophical significance. In his writings, a room is first and foremost an architectural space that a solitary writer occupies; besides, it is metaphorized as the mind that is the room—an intellectually constructed space; and lastly, it is a place narrated in his stories where his characters meditate and compose, a space that exists in words. This paper conducts studies on both Auster’s life writings and one of his fictions, Man in the Dark, in the hope of presenting the complexity of the three forms of solitary rooms and their mutual inclusion in intersubjective solitude.

In recent years, China has increasingly emphasized art education, particularly dance, for its therapeutic benefits and cultural significance. Dance Movement Therapy (DMT), which originated in the U.S. in the 1960s, integrates emotional and physical health through dance. This interdisciplinary approach combines art, psychology, and exercise, showing effectiveness in treating psychological disorders and enhancing well-being. Integrating DMT into Chinese higher education could improve mental health outcomes for students by offering an engaging, participatory alternative to traditional counseling methods.

Introduction: Few studies are available on the prevalence and sleep-related factors of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) in Chinese older adults, aiming to explore the associations between sleep characteristics and DLB.Methods: A cross-sectional study with 7,528 individuals aged ≥65 years in 106 communities in Northern China was conducted from April 2019 to January 2020. Questionaries (including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, lifestyles, and sleep characteristics) were administered, and neuropsychological assessments and physical examination were conducted in phase I; screening for probable DLB was done in phase II. Logistic regressions were used to assess associations.Results: A total of 919 (12.2%, 919/7,528) participants had dementia, and 101 (1.3%, 101/7,528) participants were diagnosed with DLB. The prevalence of dementia and DLB were slightly higher or equal in women, increased with age, and roughly decreased with nighttime sleep duration. Of the 101 participants, all of them (100.0%) had cognitive impairment, 46 (44.54%) displayed fluctuating cognition, 72 (71.29%) of them showed visual hallucination, 22 (21.78%) individuals reported RBD, and 27.71% showed Parkinsonism. Sleeping for 8 h had combined diagnostic value for DLB (AUC = 0.783, 95%CI: 0.734–0.831, p < 0.001).Conclusions: The current prevalence of DLB is 1.3% in Northern China. Short or long nighttime sleep duration is independently associated with the occurrence of dementia and DLB.

The previous article “Scientific Cosmological Ontology” discussed that the “theoretical contradictions” between quantum mechanics and relativity may become a joke in the history of human existence. It is believed that human philosophical thinking, from Socrates, Plato, to Aristotle, was a turning point. For more than 2000 years, we have been developing in the direction of material philosophy and material science according to Aristotle, and we have reached the peak of human thinking. Modern physics is a great achievement at this peak. According to the principles of dialectical materialism, this “theoretical contradiction” has opened the door to the original thinking of the universe. We have to go back 2500 years to pick up the great banner of cosmic origin that humanity has abandoned, and human thinking. This article continues to analyze the “theoretical contradictions” between quantum mechanics and relativity, and to design the philosophical framework of modern physics according to the thought of cosmic origin.

The writer is an engineering science technician. Based on the epistemology and methodology of materialist dialectics, understanding the thought of the universe origin of Taoist philosophy and Buddhist philosophy, and combining the modern scientific information of modern physics, system science and physical cosmology, the author has put forward a series of new ideas on the universe origin. The new scientific universe ontology calls on the scientific community to prove and explain the origin of the universe with science, solve the doubts of the theoretical scientific community about quantum mechanics, realize the scientific understanding of the universe space and the existence in space, create new ideas and understanding of space and time, and create a new universe view. This is not only the inspiration and verification of modern science to the primitive thought of the universe of our ancestors, but also a new method to solve the contradiction of modern physics, which inspires human beings to think about survival and existence.

Kong Mo, "said Ju Yao and Shun" But a very different political ideals, mainly due to two aspects, first, they have different historical traditions and political ideals, followed them to the Chinese Axial Age has a completely different social reality understanding and evaluation. The fundamental differences between two national school is "re-gift and what food," the legacy of Confucianism that subsistence is due to people's lack of animal desire has not been effectively contained, and therefore a set of ritual system with special emphasis on the importance for civilization. Mohist is that it is precisely because the system itself to maintain a serious ritual consumption of the material basis of society, that makes people eat to satisfy hunger instinct and Russia had the jungle. The problem of the history of ideas has not yet ended. Confucianism and Mo both originated from Yao and Shun, but they have different political ideas. This is due to their different histories and understanding of the social reality in Axes Time of China. The fundamental difference between Confucianism and Mo is "Ritual or Food, which one is more important? "Confucianism thinks the lack of living substance is because there is no limit to human desire. It pays more emphasis on the importance of Ritual to human activity, but Mo points out that it is ritual system itself that consumes much social material and leads to the unfairness in society. This is still a pending question in the history of ideology

Boston Confucianism in methodology, metaphysics, Fulfillment on the other three put forward a different view of Confucianism. In the methodology, the South Leshan to naturalistic approaches, by Whitehead's influence. In metaphysics, the view that induction is a classical Chinese philosophy, yin and yang, the most important issue in the Fulfillment theory, the more stressed the importance of ritual, that through the ceremony, Confucianism is the Fulfillment of a better way. Bostonian Confucians propose their own unique ideas in terms of methodology, metaphysics and activism. With methodology, Nan Le-shan is deeply influenced by Whitehead and takes the naturalistic approach. In terms of metaphysics, he believes that the interaction between yin and yang is the most important issue in classical Chinese philosophy. Regarding activism, he stresses the importance of Li, which he believes is a better way to activate Confucianism

Romantic irony and the irony of Marx, even though there is a strong co-expression of subjectivity, but the irony is not a Marxist aesthetic irony, but irony of practice. Although such ironic farewell to the intrinsic nature of consciousness, but still retains significant intrinsic nature of another - the intrinsic value of nature. Thus, it should prevent the burgeoning of the positivist and the Marxist tendency towards secularism. Although Marx's irony embodied the same subjectivity as romantic irony, it was practical irony rather than aesthetic. Such kind of irony departed from the interiority of consciousness but obviously had another kind of interiority, that is, the interiority of value. Thus we need to be wary of the prevalent positivism and secularization tendency in the understanding of Marx

Philosophical writing has not complained to the public, the public rhetoric of esotericism esotericism and esoteric combination of rhetoric, enlightenment and transformation of the public and other modes. Since the Enlightenment increasingly being done in the writing mode for the mass production because of mass society and mass of people in batches and by reflection. Marx's mode of writing is not for the general population, insist on their academic writing is a highly professional. Marxist philosophy of writing the current number of non-object should be to give up writing, as there are many objects of academic writing. There are several patterns of philosophical writing, such as not to communicate with the mass, combining exotericism with esotericism, and enlightening and remolding the mass. The writing pattern of facing the mass which is getting more and more popular after the Enlightenment is under review because the emergence of the mass society and the mass man. With the professional feature in his academic writings, Karl Marx's writing doesn't face the mass directly. So Marxist philosophical writing nowadays needs to avoid writing without facing certain object, but to face certain object to write

Chinese scholars tend to Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment has been interpreted as the Enlightenment, are bound into its own opposite, that is, into myth, superstition and barbarism. Dialectic of Enlightenment, only this one does not belong to the path. This is quite a problem of interpretation and attention to operation and means of contemporary Chinese thinking combined operations doctrine, promote health and increase the nihilism of modern China. According to China's traditional interpretation of dialectical thinking, "Dialectic of Enlightenment", for a correct understanding of "Dialectic of Enlightenment", and in growing nihilism, of great significance

The purpose of this dissertation is to reexamine Einstein's philosophical development and to present the main ideas of Einstein's philosophy of science, using as far as possible his original expressions. Although the subject matter has been heavily studied by many scholars, only a few offered a systematic analysis of it. Thus the interesting problems related to Einstein's philosophical development and the intricate problem of Einstein's position on the issue of interaction between science and metaphysics require further studies. ;The dissertation is divided into two parts. In the first part I attempt to clarify some basic problems related Einstein's rational realism, such as its foundation and new features, and the tortuous path which led Einstein to his mature philosophical position. Four basic requirements for constructing a satisfactory physical theory are discussed in detail. They were Einstein's metaphysical presuppositions for what the external world should be, or the possible ways of representing it. The curve in the path of founding his general theory of relativity is crucial for Einstein's philosophical development. I argue that the three aspects, complexity of reality , fictitious character of the fundamentals of scientific theory , and rationalism , ate the major epistemological lessons which Einstein learned from his work on the general theory of relativity. ;The second part discusses Einstein's epistemological credo which is the philosophical heritage that Einstein left for us. Special attention is paid to Einstein's solution to Hume's problem of induction. I try to show that, according to Einstein, there are two unavoidable jumps existing in the thought processes of both invention and justification. Einstein's schema for the process of principle theory construction may be expressed as $\rm \overline{E\sb1J\sb1ASJ\sb2E\sb2\ }.$ Hence considerations of theory choice are related to the whole process of scientific theory construction; they should not be limited to testability alone