• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Wolfgang Spohn

Universität Konstanz
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    99
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    4
  •  News and Updates
    6

 More details
  • Universität Konstanz
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
  • All publications (99)
  •  147
    The utility of pleasure is a pain for decision theory
    with Anna Kusser
    Journal of Philosophy 89 (1): 10-29. 1992.
    We shall defend two theses: (a) if a decision situation exhibits a certain causal structure, then decision theory is in trouble, because the derivation of expected utilities fails; (b) this causal structure in fact obtains in a specific, but very common kind of situation, namely, when the intrinsically evaluated psychological states are in the domain of the utility function. It will be apparent that the problem is but a variant of Joseph Butler's criticism of hedonism. Thus, in a sense, the poin…Read more
    We shall defend two theses: (a) if a decision situation exhibits a certain causal structure, then decision theory is in trouble, because the derivation of expected utilities fails; (b) this causal structure in fact obtains in a specific, but very common kind of situation, namely, when the intrinsically evaluated psychological states are in the domain of the utility function. It will be apparent that the problem is but a variant of Joseph Butler's criticism of hedonism. Thus, in a sense, the point of our paper is that modern theorizing about practical deliberation has not dealt seriously with Butler's criticism.
    Pleasure, MiscUtilityTopics in Decision Theory, Misc
  •  148
    Concepts are beliefs about essences
    with Ulrike Haas-Spohn
    In R. Stuhlmann-Laeisz, Albert Newen & Ulrich Nortmann (eds.), Proceedings of an International Symposium, Stanford, Csli Publications. 2001.
    Putnam (1975) and Burge (1979) have made a convincing case that neither mea- nings nor beliefs are in the head. Most philosophers, it seems, have accepted their argument. Putnam explained that a subject
    Theory-Based Theories of Concepts
  • Rationality, Rules and Structure (edited book)
    with Julian Nida-Rümelin
    Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2000.
    Epistemological States and Properties
  •  1
    GAP.8 Proceedings. GAP (2013) (edited book)
    with Miguel Holtje and Thomas Spitzley
    Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie. 2013.
  •  35
    Editorial
    with Wilhelm K. Essler
    Erkenntnis 47 (3): 279-279. 1997.
  •  218
    Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. (edited book)
    with Miguel Hoeltje and Thomas Spitzley
    DuEPublico. 2013.
    Selected papers from the sections of the eighth international conference organized by the Society for Analytic Philosophy (GAP), Constance, Germany, September 17-20, 2012. The overall theme of the conference was "What may we believe? What ought we to do?", but the papers published here address a wide variety of questions from many fields of philosophy.
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  40
    Editorial
    with Wilhelm K. Essler
    Erkenntnis 47 (3): 1-3. 1997.
  •  45
    Editorial
    Erkenntnis 40 (1): 1-3. 1994.
  •  18
    Editorial note
    Erkenntnis 42 (1): 1-1. 1995.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback