-
6Reduction and the neurobiological basis of consciousnessIn Anthony J. Marcel & Edoardo Bisiach (eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science, Oxford University Press. 1988.
-
76Neuroscience and psychology: should the labor be divided?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1): 133-133. 1980.
-
136“Neuroscience is Relevant for Philosophy”Problemos (88): 176-186. 2015.This is an interview with Professor Patricia S. Churchland. It covers themes such as eliminative materialism, folk psychology, neurophilosophy, the relationship between philosophy and science, moral norms as well as the criticism of contemporary analytic philosophy.
-
The view from here: The nonsymbolic structure of spatial representationIn João Branquinho (ed.), The Foundations of Cognitive Science, Oxford University Press Uk. 2001.
-
2Can neurobiology teach us anything about consciousness?" Presidential Address to the American Philosophical Associatiojn, Pacific DivisionProceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. Lancaster Press: Lancaster, Pa. forthcoming.
-
148Replies to reviews of Psychology's Place in the Science of the Mind/BrainBiology and Philosophy 3 (3): 393-402. 1988.
-
3068A critique of pure visionIn Christof Koch & Joel L. Davis (eds.), Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, Mit Press. pp. 23. 1994.Anydomainofscientificresearchhasitssustainingorthodoxy. Thatis, research on a problem, whether in astronomy, physics, or biology, is con- ducted against a backdrop of broadly shared assumptions. It is these as- sumptionsthatguideinquiryandprovidethecanonofwhatisreasonable-- of what "makes sense." And it is these shared assumptions that constitute a framework for the interpretation of research results. Research on the problem of how we see is likewise sustained by broadly shared assump- tions, wh…Read more
San Diego, California, United States of America