-
43Is neuroscience relevant to philosophy?Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 16 323-341. 1990.
-
5AcknowledgmentsIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 259-260. 2011.
-
12IndexIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 261-276. 2011.
-
108. Religion and MoralityIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 191-204. 2011.
-
3FrontmatterIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. 2011.
-
4Preface to the Princeton Science Library EditionIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. 2011.
-
67. Not as a RuleIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 163-190. 2011.
-
103. Caring and Caring forIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 27-62. 2011.
-
104. Cooperating and TrustingIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 63-94. 2011.
-
72. Brain-Based ValuesIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 12-26. 2011.
-
5BibliographyIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 235-258. 2011.
-
7ContentsIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. 2011.
-
4NotesIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 205-234. 2011.
-
136. Skills for a Social LifeIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 118-162. 2011.
-
95. Networking: Genes, Brains, and BehaviorIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 95-117. 2011.
-
3IllustrationsIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. 2011.
-
61. IntroductionIn Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton University Press. pp. 1-11. 2011.
-
Replies to Comments in Symposium on Patricia Smith Churchland's NeurophilosophyInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (2): 241-272. 1986.
-
14Review of Paul M. Churchland and Patricia Smith Churchland: On the Contrary: Critical Essays, 1987-1997 (review)British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3): 507-511. 2000.
-
4Richard Nisbett and Lee Ross, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 2 (5): 240-242. 1982.
-
Second reply to Fodor and LeporeIn Robert N. McCauley (ed.), The Churchlands and their critics, Blackwell. pp. 278--83. 1996.
-
McCauley's demand for a co-level competitorIn William P. Bechtel, Pete Mandik, Jennifer Mundale & Robert S. Stufflebeam (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader, Blackwell. pp. 457--465. 2001.
-
1011Intertheoretic reduction: A neuroscientist's field guideIn Y. Christen & P.S. Churchland (eds.), Neurophilosophy and Alzheimer's Disease, Springer Verlag. pp. 18--29. 1992.
San Diego, California, United States of America