•  83
    Comments on H. Field’s “Can We Dispense with Space-Time?‘
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984. 1984.
  •  138
    Philosophy and Spacetime Physics
    University of California Press. 1987.
    Twelve essays explore the philosophy of science in general and the physical sciences in particular A common theme unites all twelve essays: In discussing the ...
  •  55
    The Structure of Time (review)
    International Studies in Philosophy 14 (2): 110-112. 1982.
  •  414
    Types of inter-theoretic reduction
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (2): 109-124. 1967.
  •  101
    In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems
    with Stephen H. Kellert
    Philosophy of Science 64 (1): 181. 1997.
  •  103
    Gerard Emch and Chuang Liu, The Logic of Thermo-Statistical Physics (review)
    Metascience 12 (1): 59-62. 2003.
    Peer Reviewed.
  •  78
    The Concept of Physical Law by Norman Swartz (review)
    Journal of Philosophy 87 (8): 432-435. 1990.
  •  76
    Review (review)
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4): 630-632. 1996.
  •  90
    This chapter contains sections titled: The Metaphysics of Space, Time, and Motion Issues Concerning Explanation Newton's “Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy”
  •  332
    Unfair to frequencies
    Journal of Philosophy 70 (2): 41-52. 1973.
  • Physics and Chance
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1): 145-149. 1995.
    Statistical mechanics is one of the crucial fundamental theories of physics, and in his new book Lawrence Sklar, one of the pre-eminent philosophers of physics, offers a comprehensive, non-technical introduction to that theory and to attempts to understand its foundational elements. Among the topics treated in detail are: probability and statistical explanation, the basic issues in both equilibrium and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, the role of cosmology, the reduction of thermodynamics …Read more
  •  185
    I’d Love to Be a Naturalist—if Only I Knew What Naturalism Was
    Philosophy of Science 77 (5): 1121-1137. 2010.
    Naturalists tell us to rely on what science tells about the world and to eschew aprioristic philosophy. But foundational physics relies internally on modes of thinking that can only be called philosophical, and philosophical arguments rely upon what can only be called scientific inference. So what, then, could the naturalistic thesis really amount to?
  •  162
    The language of nature is mathematics—but which mathematics? And what nature?
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (3). 1998.
    In theoretical physics the physical states of systems are represented by components of mathematical structures. This paper explores three ways in which the representation of states by mathematics can give rise to foundational problems, sometimes on the side of the mathematics and sometimes on the side of understanding what the physical states are that the mathematics represents, that is on the side of interpreting the theory. Examples are given from classical mechanics, quantum mechanics and sta…Read more
  •  338
    Spacetime and conventionalism
    Philosophy of Science 71 (5): 950-959. 2004.
    Salmon, following Reichenbach and others, maintained that distant simultaneity was conventional in a special relativistic world in a way in which this was not so in prerelativistic spacetime. This paper surveys and criticizes a number of proposals to unpack this claim. It goes on to argue that if the claim has validity, it rests upon differing facts about epistemic accessibility of temporal relations in the different spacetimes, and not directly upon any facts about differing causal structures i…Read more
  •  94
    In nine new essays, distinguished philosophers of science discuss outstanding issues in scientific methodology --especially that of the physical sciences-and address philosophical questions that arise in the exploration of the foundations of contemporary science.
  •  73
    Comments on Malament’s “ ”Time Travel’ in the Godel Universe‘
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984. 1984.
  •  59
    Philosophy and the Foundations of Dynamics
    Cambridge University Press. 2012.
    Although now replaced by more modern theories, classical mechanics remains a core foundational element of physical theory. From its inception, the theory of dynamics has been riddled with conceptual issues and differing philosophical interpretations and throughout its long historical development, it has shown subtle conceptual refinement. The interpretive program for the theory has also shown deep evolutionary change over time. Lawrence Sklar discusses crucial issues in the central theory from w…Read more
  •  152
    Topology Versus Measure in Statistical Mechanics
    The Monist 83 (2): 258-273. 2000.
    Mathematical physics works by representing the contents of the world and the world’s dynamical changes by the components of some mathematical structure and the transformations one can impose on these components. Quite rightly, philosophers of science have concentrated much attention on trying to understand how physicists arrive at the appropriate transformational rules to represent dynamical evolution in the world, that is, on how they find the correct laws of nature. But the preliminary problem…Read more
  •  94
    Naturalism and the Interpretation of Theories
    Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 75 (2). 2001.
  •  67
    About the Series Contemporary philosophy of science combines a general study from a philosophical perspective of the methods of science, with an inquiry, again from the philosophical point of view, into foundational issues that arise in the various special sciences. Methodological philosophy of science has deep connections with issues at the center of pure philosophy. It makes use of important results, for example, in traditional epistemology, metaphysics and the philosophy of language. It also …Read more
  •  60
    Book Review:Unity of Science Robert L. Causey (review)
    Philosophy of Science 47 (4): 656-. 1980.