-
1863Cohen, G. A. Why Not Socialism? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009 . Pp. 83. $14.95 (cloth)Ethics 120 (2): 391-395. 2010.
-
1071Women’s Human Rights, Then and Now: Symposium on Eileen Hunt Botting’s Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights(New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016)Political Theory 46 (3): 426-454. 2018.
-
3645
-
318Book Review: Robert Spaemann, Persons: The Difference Between `Someone' and `Something', trans. Oliver O'Donovan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006). vii + 255 pp. 45 (hb), ISBN 978 0 19 928181 (review)Studies in Christian Ethics 20 (3): 440-443. 2007.
-
36Review of Ross Harrison (ed.), Henry Sidgwick (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (10). 2002.
-
191Ends and EndingsAmerican Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4): 807-821. 2014.The question posed in this paper is: Is there an end to some type of activity which is the end of any rational agent? It approaches an answer by a critical examination of one view of human beings that excludes this possibility, that advanced by Harry Frankfurt. It is argued that once we have distinguished, as Frankfurt does not, that which we have good reason to care about from that which we do not have good reason to care about, we are able to identify a conception of a final end for human acti…Read more
-
10Intractable moral disagreementsIn Lawrence S. Cunningham (ed.), Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics, University of Notre Dame Press. 2009.
-
201What Morality Is NotPhilosophy 32 (123): 325-335. 1957.The central task to which contemporary moral philosophers have addressed themselves is that of listing the distinctive characteristics of moral utterances. In this paper I am concerned to propound an entirely negative thesis about these characteristics. It is widely held that it is of the essence of moral valuations that they are universalisable and prescriptive. This is the contention which I wish to deny. I shall proceed by first examining the thesis that moral judgments are necessarily and es…Read more
-
147What More Needs to Be Said? A Beginning, Although Only a Beginning, at Saying ItAnalyse & Kritik 30 (1): 261-281. 2008.The responses to my critics are as various as their criticisms, focusing successively on the distinctive character of modern moral disagreements, on the nature of common goods and their relationship to the virtues, on how the inequalities generated by advanced capitalist economies and by the contemporary state prevent the achievement of common goods, on issues concerning the nature of the self, on what it is that Marx’s theory enables us to understand and on how some Marxists have failed to unde…Read more
-
35Philosophy: Past Conflict and Future DirectionProceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 61 (1). 1987.
-
130Symposium: Purpose and Intelligent ActionAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 34 (1). 1960.
-
71First principles, final ends, and contemporary philosophical issuesMarquette University Press. 1990.Presents MacIntyre's most explicit defense of his approach to Thomistic metaphysics. This lecture follows MacIntyre's argument in After Virtue that modern philosophy has very literally lost its way, and the problems it faces are insoluble. The difficulties are twofold, and stem from the Cartesian turn to the self in the XVith century.
Alasdair MacIntyre
(1929 - 2025)
Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America