-
113Category induction and representationIn [Book Chapter], . 1987.A provisional model is presented in which categorical perception (CP) provides our basic or elementary categories. In acquiring a category we learn to label or identify positive and negative instances from a sample of confusable alternatives. Two kinds of internal representation are built up in this learning by "acquaintance": (1) an iconic representation that subserves our similarity judgments and (2) an analog/digital feature-filter that picks out the invariant information allowing us to categ…Read more
-
21The experimental analysis of naming behavior can tell us exactly the kinds of things Horne & Lowe (H & L) report here: (1) the conditions under which people and animals succeed or fail in naming things and (2) the conditions under which bidirectional associations are formed between inputs (objects, pictures of objects, seen or heard names of objects) and outputs (spoken names of objects, multimodal operations on objects). The "stimulus equivalence" that H & L single out is really just the reflex…Read more
-
2Maturana’s autopoietic hermeneutics versus Turing’s causal methodology for explaining cognitionPragmatics and Cognition 15 (3): 599-603. 2007.Kravchenko suggests replacing Turing's suggestion for explaining cognizers' cognitive capacity through autonomous robotic modelling by 'autopoiesis', Maturana's extremely vague metaphor for the relations and interactions among organisms, environments, and various subordinate and superordinate systems therein. I suggest that this would be an exercise in hermeneutics rather than causal explanation.
-
131Connecting object to symbol in modeling cognitionIn A. Clark & Ronald Lutz (eds.), Connectionism in Context, Springer Verlag. pp. 75--90. 1992.Connectionism and computationalism are currently vying for hegemony in cognitive modeling. At first glance the opposition seems incoherent, because connectionism is itself computational, but the form of computationalism that has been the prime candidate for encoding the "language of thought" has been symbolic computationalism (Dietrich 1990, Fodor 1975, Harnad 1990c; Newell 1980; Pylyshyn 1984), whereas connectionism is nonsymbolic (Fodor & Pylyshyn 1988, or, as some have hopefully dubbed it, "s…Read more
-
26Editorial commentaryBehavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5): 973-974. 2001.Let us simplify the problem of “consciousness” or “visual consciousness”: Seeing is feeling. The difference between an optical transducer/effector that merely interacts with optical input, and a conscious system that sees, is that there is something it feels like for that conscious system to see, and that system feels that feeling. All talk about “internal representations” and internal or external difference registration or detection, and so on, is beside the point. The point is that what is see…Read more
-
19Broca's area and language evolutionBehavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4): 1-5. 2005.: Grodzinsky associates Broca's area with three kinds of deficit, relating to articulation, comprehension (involving trace deletion), and production (involving "tree priming"). Could these be special cases of one deficit? Evidence from research on language evolution suggests that they may all involve syllable structure or those aspects of syntax that evolved through exploiting the neural mechanisms underlying syllable structure
-
47Against computational hermeneuticsSocial Epistemology 4 167-172. 1990.Critique of Computationalism as merely projecting hermeneutics (i.e., meaning originating from the mind of an external interpreter) onto otherwise intrinsically meaningless symbols.
-
64Dalgaard's recent article [3] argues that the part of the Web that constitutes the scientific literature is composed of increasingly linked archives. He describes the move in the online communications of the scientific community towards an expanding zone of secondorder textuality, of an evolving network of texts commenting on, citing, classifying, abstracting, listing and revising other texts. In this respect, archives are becoming a network of texts rather than simply a classified collection of…Read more
-
18Codes, communication and cognitionBehavioral and Brain Sciences 42. 2019.Brette criticizes the notion of neural coding because it seems to entail that neural signals need to “decoded” by or for some receiver in the head. If that were so, then neural coding would indeed be homuncular, requiring an entity to decipher the code. But I think Brette's plea to think instead in terms of complex, interactive causal throughput is preaching to the converted. Turing has already shown the way. In any case, the metaphor of neural coding has little to do with the symbol grounding p…Read more
-
67Artificial life: Synthetic versus virtualIn Chris Langton (ed.), Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Volume XVI: 539ff, Addison-wesley. 1993.Artificial life can take two forms: synthetic and virtual. In principle, the materials and properties of synthetic living systems could differ radically from those of natural living systems yet still resemble them enough to be really alive if they are grounded in the relevant causal interactions with the real world. Virtual (purely computational) "living" systems, in contrast, are just ungrounded symbol systems that are systematically interpretable as if they were alive; in reality they are no m…Read more
-
101Consciousness: An afterthoughtCognition and Brain Theory 5 29-47. 1982.There are many possible approaches to the mind/brain problem. One of the most prominent, and perhaps the most practical, is to ignore it
-
155Symbol grounding and the symbolic theft hypothesisIn Angelo Cangelosi & Domenico Parisi (eds.), Simulating the Evolution of Language, Springer Verlag. pp. 191--210. 2002.Scholars studying the origins and evolution of language are also interested in the general issue of the evolution of cognition. Language is not an isolated capability of the individual, but has intrinsic relationships with many other behavioral, cognitive, and social abilities. By understanding the mechanisms underlying the evolution of linguistic abilities, it is possible to understand the evolution of cognitive abilities. Cognitivism, one of the current approaches in psychology and cognitive s…Read more
-
2A subversive proposalIn A. Okerson & J. O'Donnell (eds.), Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing., . 1995.
-
20Controversies in Neuroscience III Signal transduction in the retinaBehavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3): 401-401. 1995.
-
472Can a machine be conscious? How?Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4-5): 67-75. 2003.A "machine" is any causal physical system, hence we are machines, hence machines can be conscious. The question is: which kinds of machines can be conscious? Chances are that robots that can pass the Turing Test -- completely indistinguishable from us in their behavioral capacities -- can be conscious (i.e. feel), but we can never be sure (because of the "other-minds" problem). And we can never know HOW they have minds, because of the "mind/body" problem. We can only know how they pass the Turin…Read more
-
McGill UniversityProfessor
-
McGill UniversityProfessor (Part-time)
Areas of Specialization
Other Academic Areas |
Areas of Interest
Other Academic Areas |
Science, Logic, and Mathematics |