-
106Publicity in morality: A reply to Katarzyna de lazari-Radek and Peter SingerRatio 23 (1): 111-117. 2010.
-
104Procedural and substantive practical rationalityIn Piers Rawling & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 57--74. 2003.This chapter surveys the debate between philosophers who claim that all practical rationality is procedural and philosophers who claim that some practical rationality is substantive.
-
97Act-consequentialism versus rule-consequentialismIn Steven M. Cahn & Andrew Forcehimes (eds.), Principles of Moral Philosophy: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Oxford University Press. 2016.
-
97Does Having Deep Personal Relationships Constitute an Element of Well-Being?Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 95 (1): 1-24. 2021.Deep personal relationships involve deep mutual understanding and strong mutual affection. This paper focuses on whether having deep personal relationships is one of the elements of well-being. Roger Crisp put forward thought experiments which might be taken to suggest that having deep personal relationships has only instrumental value as a means to other elements of well-being. The different conclusion this paper draws is that having deep personal relationships is an element of well-being if, b…Read more
-
97Thinking about reasons: themes from the philosophy of Jonathan Dancy (edited book)Oxford University Press. 2013.Thinking about Reasons collects fourteen new essays on ethics and the philosophy of action, inspired by the work of Jonathan Dancy—one of his generation's most influential moral philosophers.
-
95Acts or rules? The fine tuning of utilitarianismIn John Perry (ed.), God, the Good, and Utilitarianism: Perspectives on Peter Singer, Cambridge University Press. pp. 125-138. 2014.
-
92Wrongness, evolutionary debunking, public rulesEtica and Politica / Ethics and Politics 18 133-148. 2016.Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer’s wonderful book, The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics, contains a wealth of intriguing arguments and compelling ideas. The present paper focuses on areas of continuing dispute. The paper first attacks LazariRadek’s and Singer’s evolutionary debunking arguments against both egoism and parts of common-sense morality. The paper then addresses their discussion of the role of rules in utilitarianism. De Lazari-Radek and Singer…Read more
-
92Contractualism, spare wheel, aggregationIn Matt Matravers (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Frank Cass. pp. 53-76. 2002.This essay explores the reasons for thinking that Scanlon's contractualist principle serves merely as a ?spare wheel?, an element that spins along nicely but bears no real weight, because it presupposes too much of what it should be explaning. The ambitions and scope of Scanlon's contractualism are discussed, as is Scanlon's thesis that contracualism will assess candidate moral principles individually rather than as sets. The final third of the paper critizes Scanlon's account of fairness and hi…Read more
-
91The Golden RuleThink 4 (10): 25-29. 2005.Should you always do unto others as you would have them do unto you? Brad Hooker investigates a seemingly plausible-looking moral principle: the Golden Rule
-
88Promises and rule consequentialismIn Hanoch Sheinman (ed.), Promises and Agreements, Oxford University Press. pp. 235-252. 2011.The duty to keep promises has many aspects associated with deontological moral theories. The duty to keep promises is non-welfarist, in that the obligation to keep a promise need not be conditional on there being a net benefit from keeping the promise—indeed need not be conditional on there being at least someone who would benefit from its being kept. The duty to keep promises is more closely connected to autonomy than directly to welfare: agents have moral powers to give themselves certain obli…Read more
-
87Morality and the good lifeThe Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53): 91-95. 2011.Being moral sometimes handicaps decent people in their pursuit of worthwhile goals. This is especially likely to happen when those with power in society have badly mistaken ideas about what morality requires. A good person might not last long in a bad society.
-
85Review of Law's Rule: the Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of LawNotre Dame Philosophical Reviews. 2023.Book review of Postema's Law's Rule.
-
79The demands of consequentialism, by Tim Mulgan. Oxford: Clarendon press, 2001, 313 pp. + VI, ??35, $49.95 (hbk). ISBN 0-1-825093- (review)Philosophy 78 (2): 289-307. 2003.
-
76Rule-consequentialism and obligations toward the needyPacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1). 1998.Most of us believe morality requires us to help the desperately needy. But most of us also believe morality doesn't require us to make enormous sacrifices in order to help people who have no special connection with us. Such self-sacrifice is of course praiseworthy, but it isn't morally mandatory. Rule-consequentialism might seem to offer a plausible grounding for such beliefs. Tim Mulgan has recently argued in _Analysis and _Pacific Philosophical Quarterly that rule-consequentialism cannot do so…Read more
-
72Deep personal relationships, value, merit, and changeRatio 35 (4): 344-351. 2022.A paper of Roger Crisp’s four years ago contained arguments that seemed to imply that having deep personal relationships does not constitute an element of well‐being. The lesson to draw from that paper of Crisp’s, according to a recent journal article of mine, is that one’s having a deep personal relationship does constitute an element of one’s well‐being on condition that one’s affection for the other person is merited. Crisp’s paper earlier in this issue of Ratio responds to my arguments. Here…Read more
-
70
-
70What makes a judgement a moral judgementJournal of Political Theory and Philosophy 1 (1): 97-112. 2017.What distinguishes moral judgements from judgements of other kinds? In addressing this question, this paper tries to remain as neutral as possible about which moral judgments are correct. The paper addresses objections to thinking that the defining feature of moral judgements is their other-regarding grounds, or their social function, or their motivational force, or their connection to reactive attitudes such as guilt, indignation, and resentment. The proposal this paper makes is that a judgment…Read more
-
70Scanlon versus Moore on goodnessIn Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore, Oxford University Press. pp. 149. 2006.
-
69Wrongness, evolutionary debunking, public rulesEtica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 18 (1): 135-149. 2016.Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer’s wonderful book, The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics, contains a wealth of intriguing arguments and compelling ideas. The present paper focuses on areas of continuing dispute. The paper first attacks LazariRadek’s and Singer’s evolutionary debunking arguments against both egoism and parts of common-sense morality. The paper then addresses their discussion of the role of rules in utilitarianism. De Lazari-Radek and Singer…Read more
-
65Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, FairnessProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95. 1995.Brad Hooker; II*—Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness1, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 95, Issue 1, 1 June 1995, Pages 19–36, https://d.
-
65When is impartiality morally appropriate?In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and impartiality: morality, special relationships, and the wider world, Oxford University Press. pp. 26-41. 2010.
-
65Theory versus Anti-theory in EthicsIn Ulrike Heuer & Gerald Lang (eds.), Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes From the Ethics of Bernard Williams, Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 19. 2012.
-
62Theories of welfare, theories of good reasons for action, and ontological naturalismPhilosophical Papers 20 (1): 25-36. 1991.No abstract
-
61Mark Overvold’s Contribution to PhilosophyJournal of Philosophical Research 16 333-344. 1991.The prevailing theory of self-interest (personal utility or individual welfare) holds that one’s Iife goes well to the extent that one’s desires are fulfilled. In a couple of seminal papers, Overvold raised a devastating objection to this theory---namely that the theory (added to commonsensical beliefs about the nature of action) makes self-sacrifice logically impossible. He then proposed an appealing revision of the prevailing theory, one which provided adequate logical space for self-sacrifice…Read more
-
59Reply to Arneson and McIntyrePhilosophical Issues 15 (1). 2005.Richard Arneson and Alison McIntyre have done me a great honor by reading my book Ideal Code, Real World so carefully.1 In addition, they have done me a great kindness by reading it sympathetically. Nevertheless, they each find the book ultimately unconvincing, though in very different ways. But the cause of their dissatisfaction with the book is not mistaken interpretation. They have interpreted the book accurately, and they have advanced penetrating criticisms of it. One group of their critici…Read more
-
58The demandingness objectionIn Tim Chappell (ed.), The Problem of Moral Demandingness, Palgrave. pp. 148-62. 2009.
-
57The role(s) of rules in consequentialist ethicsIn Douglas Portmore (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Consequentialism, . 2020.After preliminaries concerning different accounts of the good and the distinction between actual-consequence consequentialism and expected-value consequentialism, this paper explains why consequentialists should prescribe a moral decision procedure dominated by rules. But act-consequentialists deny rules have a role in the criterion of moral rightness. Prescribing a decision procedure dominated by rules and then denying rules a role in the criterion of rightness can be problematic. Rule-conseque…Read more
Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Areas of Specialization
Normative Ethics |
Meta-Ethics |
Value Theory |
Social and Political Philosophy |
Areas of Interest
Normative Ethics |
Value Theory |
Meta-Ethics |