• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Murray Miles

Brock University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    75
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
  • Brock University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Email (login required)
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics and Epistemology
History of Western Philosophy
Other Academic Areas
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics and Epistemology
History of Western Philosophy
Other Academic Areas
  • All publications (75)
  •  160
    Kant's ‘Copernican Revolution’: Toward Rehabilitation of a Concept and Provision of a Framework for the Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason
    Kant Studien 97 (1): 1-32. 2006.
    Against those commentators who consider Kant’s explicit reference to Copernicus’s heliocentric reversal either grossly misleading or simply irrelevant to the revolution in philosophy carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason, it is argued in this paper that Kant’s transcendental idealist inversion of the familiar standpoint of realism and sound common sense fully justifies the talk of a ‘Copernican revolution,’ even if Kant himself never used the expression. It is not just the dominant ‘moving …Read more
    Against those commentators who consider Kant’s explicit reference to Copernicus’s heliocentric reversal either grossly misleading or simply irrelevant to the revolution in philosophy carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason, it is argued in this paper that Kant’s transcendental idealist inversion of the familiar standpoint of realism and sound common sense fully justifies the talk of a ‘Copernican revolution,’ even if Kant himself never used the expression. It is not just the dominant ‘moving spectator’ motif (or transcendental turn) of the Preface that has to do with Copernicus; both the immediately following ‘crucial experiment’ motif (on the distinction between appearances and things in themselves) and the ‘critical’ motif (regarding self-knowledge and the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments) confirm the aptness of the Copernican analogy. Still, some commentators have stretched the analogy too far; the final section of the paper attempts to determine just how far it may reasonably be said to go.
    Kant: Critique of Pure ReasonKant: Metaphysics and Epistemology, MiscKant: MetaphysicsKant: Epistemo…Read more
    Kant: Critique of Pure ReasonKant: Metaphysics and Epistemology, MiscKant: MetaphysicsKant: Epistemology
  •  39
    16. Idea and Object
    In Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 263-278. 1999.
  •  34
    Frontmatter
    In Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 1999.
    René Descartes
  •  29
    14. Certainty and Circularity
    In Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 205-228. 1999.
  •  29
    Contents
    In Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 1999.
    René Descartes
  •  36
    Index of names
    In Inroads: Paths in Ancient and Modern Western Philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 663-666. 2003.
  •  27
    Introduction
    In Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 1-2. 1999.
  •  47
    Descartes's Method
    In Janet Broughton & John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes, Wiley-blackwell. 2007.
    This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction; The Intuitive, the Discursive, and the Ratiocinative; The Order of Intuition; Analytic and Synthetic Method; Method and the Mathematical Ideal; Universal Mathematics, Metaphysics, and Physics; Conclusion; Acknowledgments; Notes References and Further Reading.
    17th/18th Century Philosophy
  •  24
    Contents
    In Inroads: Paths in Ancient and Modern Western Philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 2003.
  •  41
    Russian Translation of: Kant’s ‘Copernican Revolution’: Toward Rehabilitation of a Concept and Provision of a Framework for the Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason (Translated by M.D. Lakhuti)
    Studies in Transcendental Philosophy 3 (1-2). 2022.
    Against those commentators who consider Kant’s explicit reference to Copernicus’s heliocentric reversal either grossly misleading or simply irrelevant to the revolution in philosophy carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason, it is argued in this paper that Kant’s transcendental idealist inversion of the familiar standpoint of realism and sound common sense fully justifies the talk of a ‘Copernican revolution,’ even if Kant himself never used the expression. It is not just the dominant ‘moving …Read more
    Against those commentators who consider Kant’s explicit reference to Copernicus’s heliocentric reversal either grossly misleading or simply irrelevant to the revolution in philosophy carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason, it is argued in this paper that Kant’s transcendental idealist inversion of the familiar standpoint of realism and sound common sense fully justifies the talk of a ‘Copernican revolution,’ even if Kant himself never used the expression. It is not just the dominant ‘moving spectator’ motif (or transcendental turn) of the Preface that has to do with Copernicus; both the immediately following ‘crucial experiment’ motif (on the distinction between appearances and things in themselves) and the ‘critical’ motif (regarding self-knowledge and the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments) confirm the aptness of the Copernican analogy. Still, some commentators have stretched the analogy too far; the final section of the paper attempts to determine just how far it may reasonably be said to go.
    European PhilosophyImmanuel Kant
  •  80
    Fundamental Ontology and Existential Analysis in Heidegger’s Being and Time
    International Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3): 349-359. 1994.
    Martin Heidegger
  •  21
    20. Experience and Induction
    In Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 336-360. 1999.
  •  127
    Connaissance de Dieu et conscience de soi chez Descartes
    Dialogue 49 (1): 1-24. 2010.
    ABSTRACT: The analytic method by which Descartes established the first principle of his philosophy is a unique cognitive process of direct insight and non-logical inference that differs markedly from the deductive model of noetic apprehension long associated with seventeenth-century rationalism. In this paper, it is shown that the same analytic process is at work in the Third Meditation proof of the innateness of the idea of God, where, however, there are serious doubts about its legitimacy
    René Descartes
  • Überlegungen zum Metaphysik-Begriff Kants
    Perspektiven der Philosophie 30 (1): 37-62. 2004.
  •  103
    Heidegger and the question of humanism
    Man and World 22 (4): 427-451. 1989.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback