-
372RésuméLa critique kantienne de la psychologie rationnelle est une expérience de pensée visant ni un individu ni une école, mais une tendance de la raison humaine à « hypostasier » la condition intellectuelle suprême d'une connaissance quelconque (le « Je pense ») en connaissance du « moi ». Cette tendance implique une circularité qui est également la cible des critiques transcendantales bien plus familières qui visent Locke et Hume. De même qu'un nouveau type de cercle (dit « de niveau »), cet a…Read more
-
20The Idea of Extension: Innate or Adventitious? On R. F. McRae's Interpretation of DescartesDialogue 27 (1): 15-. 1988.It will come as no surprise that I have a different interpretation of the four passages in which, McRae claims, Descartes “definitely includes extension and its modes in what is given through the senses”. In the first, Descartes includes extension, etc., among his ideas of corporeal bodies. This is not to say that he includes them among his adventitious ideas, though. All adventitious ideas are ideas of external bodies. But the converse is not true. Not all ideas of corporeal bodies are ipso fac…Read more
-
102. Scholastic-Aristotelian MetaphysicsIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 11-23. 1999.
-
8ReferencesIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 531-546. 1999.
-
6Note on texts and quotationsIn Inroads: Paths in Ancient and Modern Western Philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 2003.
-
78. The Structure of ThoughtIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 86-95. 1999.
-
411. The Kinds of CertaintyIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 148-164. 1999.
-
1318. Reflexion and InnatenessIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 291-320. 1999.
-
69. Pure and Empirical ThoughtIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 96-106. 1999.
-
Marcelo Dascal, Leibniz: Language, Signs and Thought (review)Philosophy in Review 8 (7): 258-260. 1988.
-
419. The Model of the MindIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 321-335. 1999.
-
417. The Inferential Import of the ErgoIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 279-290. 1999.
-
21Part one: Thought and consciousnessIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 55-55. 1999.
-
18PrefaceIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 1999.
-
2Review of: Frank Schalow, Imagination and Existence. Heidegger's Retrieval of Kant's Ethics Reviewed by (review)Philosophy in Review 7 (3): 130-132. 1987.
-
5Glossary of philosophical termsIn Inroads: Paths in Ancient and Modern Western Philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 637-662. 2003.
-
815. Consciousness, Thought, and ReflexionIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 229-262. 1999.
-
128Analytic Method, the Cogito, and Descartes’s Argument for the Innateness of the Idea of GodEpoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2): 289-320. 2010.The analytic method by which Descartes discovered the first principle of his philosophy—cogito, ergo sum—is a unique cognitive process of direct insight and nonlogical inference. It differs markedly from inductive as well as deductive procedures, but also from older models of the direct noetic apprehension of first principles, notably those of Plato and Aristotle. However, a critical examination of Descartes’s argument for the innateness of the idea of God shows that there are serious obstacles …Read more
-
103Against those commentators who consider Kant’s explicit reference to Copernicus’s heliocentric reversal either grossly misleading or simply irrelevant to the revolution in philosophy carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason, it is argued in this paper that Kant’s transcendental idealist inversion of the familiar standpoint of realism and sound common sense fully justifies the talk of a ‘Copernican revolution,’ even if Kant himself never used the expression. It is not just the dominant ‘moving …Read more
-
1916. Idea and ObjectIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 263-278. 1999.
-
7FrontmatterIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 1999.
-
1014. Certainty and CircularityIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 205-228. 1999.
-
9ContentsIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 1999.
-
16Index of namesIn Inroads: Paths in Ancient and Modern Western Philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 663-666. 2003.
-
9IntroductionIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 1-2. 1999.
-
10Descartes's MethodIn John Carriero & Janet Broughton (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Descartes, Blackwell. 2007.This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction; The Intuitive, the Discursive, and the Ratiocinative; The Order of Intuition; Analytic and Synthetic Method; Method and the Mathematical Ideal; Universal Mathematics, Metaphysics, and Physics; Conclusion; Acknowledgments; Notes References and Further Reading.
-
12ContentsIn Inroads: Paths in Ancient and Modern Western Philosophy, University of Toronto Press. 2003.
-
19Russian Translation of: Kant’s ‘Copernican Revolution’: Toward Rehabilitation of a Concept and Provision of a Framework for the Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason (Translated by M.D. Lakhuti)Studies in Transcendental Philosophy 3 (1-2). 2022.Against those commentators who consider Kant’s explicit reference to Copernicus’s heliocentric reversal either grossly misleading or simply irrelevant to the revolution in philosophy carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason, it is argued in this paper that Kant’s transcendental idealist inversion of the familiar standpoint of realism and sound common sense fully justifies the talk of a ‘Copernican revolution,’ even if Kant himself never used the expression. It is not just the dominant ‘moving …Read more
-
33Fundamental Ontology and Existential Analysis in Heidegger’s Being and TimeInternational Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3): 349-359. 1994.
-
620. Experience and InductionIn Murray Lewis Miles (ed.), Insight and inference: Descartes's founding principle and modern philosophy, University of Toronto Press. pp. 336-360. 1999.