-
1976Free agencyJournal of Philosophy 72 (April): 205-20. 1975.In the subsequent pages, I want to develop a distinction between wanting and valuing which will enable the familiar view of freedom to make sense of the notion of an unfree action. The contention will be that, in the case of actions that are unfree, the agent is unable to get what he most wants, or values, and this inability is due to his own "motivational system." In this case the obstruction to the action that he most wants to do is his own will. It is in this respect that the action is unfree…Read more
-
103Asymmetry and Rational AbilityPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2): 467-475. 2013.For a symposium on Dana Nelkin's Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility.
-
134Raz on ResponsibilityCriminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3): 395-409. 2016.Standard treatments of responsibility have been preoccupied with issues of blame and punishment, and concerns about free will. In contrast, Raz is concerned with problems about responsibility that arise from the “puzzle of moral luck,” puzzles that lead to misguided skepticism about negligence. We are responsible not only for conduct that is successfully guided by what we take to be our reasons for action, but also for misexercises of our rational capacities that escape our rational control. To …Read more
-
276Free will (edited book)Oxford University Press. 1982.The new edition of this highly successful text will once again provide the ideal introduction to free will. This volume brings together some of the most influential contributions to the topic of free will during the past 50 years, as well as some notable recent work
-
237Disordered Appetites: Addiction, Compulsion and DependenceIn Jon Elster (ed.), Addiction: Entries and Exits, Russell Sage Publications. 1999.
-
203
-
556Skepticism about weakness of willPhilosophical Review 86 (3): 316-339. 1977.My concern in this paper will be to explore and develop a version of nonsocratic skepticism about weakness of will. In my view, socratism is incorrect, but like Socrates, I think that the common understanding of weakness of will raises serious problems. Contrary to socratism, it is possible for a person knowingly to act contrary to his or her better judgment. But this description does not exhaust the common view of weakness. Also implicit in this view is the belief that actions which are contrar…Read more
-
279Agency and answerability: selected essaysOxford University Press. 2004.Since the 1970s Gary Watson has published a series of brilliant and highly influential essays on human action, examining such questions as: in what ways are we free and not free, rational and irrational, responsible or not for what we do? Moral philosophers and philosophers of action will welcome this collection, representing one of the most important bodies of work in the field.
-
164The Work of the WillIn Sarah Stroud & Christine Tappolet (eds.), Weakness of will and practical irrationality, Oxford University Press. 2003.The first part of the essay explores the relations between the will and practical reason or judgement. The second part takes up decision in the realm of belief, i.e. deciding that such and such is so. This phenomenon raises two questions. Since we decide that as well as to, should we speak of a doxastic will? Secondly, should we regard ourselves as active in the formation of our judgements as in the formation of our intentions? The author's answer to these two further questions is ‘no’ and ‘yes’…Read more
-
5Robert J. Richman, God, Free Will, and Morality Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 5 (5): 213-218. 1985.
Los Angeles, California, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Action |
Normative Ethics |
Social and Political Philosophy |
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action |
Normative Ethics |
Social and Political Philosophy |