•  33
    Platonism and laws: A reply to Demetra Sfendoni‐Mentzou
    International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (3). 1994.
    his paper is a reply to Demetra Sfendoni‐Mentzou; it defends a realist—indeed a platonist—account of laws of nature.
  •  49
    Platonism, Metaphor, and Mathematics
    Dialogue 43 (1): 47-. 2004.
    RésuméDans leur livre récent, George Lakoff et Rafael Núñez se livrent à une critique naturaliste soutenue du platonisme traditionnel concernant les entités mathématiques. Ils affirment que des résultats récents en sciences cognitives démontrent qu'il est faux. En particulier, ils estiment que la découverte que la cognition mathématique s'appuie pour une large part sur les métaphores conceptuelles est incompatible avec le platonisme. Nous montrons ici que tel n'est pas le cas. Nous examinons et …Read more
  •  34
    History and the Norms of Science
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980. 1980.
    Starting from the assumption that the history of science is, in some significant sense, rational and thus that historical episodes may serve as evidence in choosing between competing normative methodologies of science, the question arises: "Just what is this history-methodology evidential relation?" After examining the proposals of Laudan, a more plausible account is proposed.
  •  82
    What is applied mathematics?
    Foundations of Science 2 (1): 21-37. 1997.
    A number of issues connected with the nature of applied mathematics are discussed. Among the claims are these: mathematics "hooks onto" the world by providing models or representations, not by describing the world; classic platonism is to be preferred to structuralism; and several issues in the philosophy of science are intimately connected to the nature of applied mathematics
  •  30
    Book reviews (review)
    Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3): 251-253. 1996.
  •  172
    Thought Experiments in Science, Philosophy, and Mathematics
    Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1): 3-27. 2007.
    Most disciplines make use of thought experiments, but physics and philosophy lead the pack with heavy dependence upon them. Often this is for conceptual clarification, but occasionally they provide real theoretical advances. In spite of their importance, however, thought experirnents have received rather little attention as a topic in their own right until recently. The situation has improved in the past few years, but a mere generation ago the entire published literature on thought experiments …Read more
  •  13
    Reply to Puccetti
    Philosophical Quarterly 34 (134): 59-62. 1984.
  •  61
    Critical studies/book reviews
    with Leng Mary
    Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2): 244-246. 2001.