-
1Richard W. Miller, Moral Differences: Truth, Justice and Conscience in a World of Conflict Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 13 (3): 111-113. 1993.
-
55Just War, Regular War, and Perpetual PeaceKant Studien 107 (1): 179-195. 2016.Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 107 Heft: 1 Seiten: 179-195.
-
25IndexIn Force and freedom: Kant's legal and political philosophy, Harvard University Press. pp. 389-399. 2009.
-
249. Public Right III: Redistribution and Equality of OpportunityIn Force and freedom: Kant's legal and political philosophy, Harvard University Press. pp. 267-299. 2009.
-
3Equality, Responsibility, and the LawCambridge University Press. 1998.This book examines responsibility and luck as these issues arise in tort law, criminal law, and distributive justice. The central question is: whose bad luck is a particular piece of misfortune? Arthur Ripstein argues that there is a general set of principles to be found that clarifies responsibility in those cases where luck is most obviously an issue: accidents, mistakes, emergencies, and failed attempts at crime. In revealing how the problems that arise in tort and criminal law as well as dis…Read more
-
145Commodity FetishismCanadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (4). 1987.Criticism and sarcasm are interspersed with description and analysis throughout Marx's work. Most of the criticism is aimed at one or another side of a single target: what Marx sees as capitalism's pretensions of freedom, equality, and prosperity in the face of exploitation and recurrent crises. But the remarks on commodity fetishism in the first volume of Capital seem to be directed at a different target. Here Marx tells us that a commodity is ‘a queer thing, abounding in metaphysical subtletie…Read more
-
64Three duties to rescue: Moral, civil, and criminal (review)Law and Philosophy 19 (6): 751-779. 2000.No Abstract
-
67Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier (edited book)Cambridge University Press. 2001.What are preferences and are they reasons for action? Is it rational to cooperate with others even if that entails acting against one's preferences? The dominant position in philosophy on the topic of practical rationality is that one acts so as to maximize the satisfaction of one's preferences. This view is most closely associated with the work of David Gauthier, and in this collection of essays some of the most innovative philosophers working in this field explore the controversies surrounding…Read more
-
51Law and DisagreementPhilosophical Review 110 (4): 611. 2001.The most obvious way of settling disagreements peacefully is to take a vote. Yet, as Jeremy Waldron points out, the attitudes of philosophers and political theorists towards majority voting have ranged from indifference to hostility. Piled on top of all this scorn for legislation comes further scorn from social choice theorists, who insist that majority rule is useless as a means of making decisions.
-
1Jean Hampton, Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 8 (3): 94-96. 1988.
-
235. Private Right III: Contract and ConsentIn Force and freedom: Kant's legal and political philosophy, Harvard University Press. pp. 107-144. 2009.
-
2David Miller, Market, State, and Community: Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 11 (4): 278-279. 1991.