• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Brian E. Butler

University of North Carolina, Asheville
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    66
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    41

 More details
  • University of North Carolina, Asheville
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Claremont College
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1993
Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Aesthetics
Applied Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Philosophy of Law
Social and Political Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
Philosophy of the Americas
2 more
  • All publications (66)
  •  1
    Posner's Problem with Moral Philosophy
    The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 7 325-343. 2000.
    Interpretivist Theories of Law
  • Is All Judicial Decision-Making Unavoidably Interpretive?
    Legal Studies Forum 3 315-329. 2001.
    Legal Reasoning and Adjudication, MiscInterpretivist Theories of Law
  •  90
    Sen’s The Idea of Justice: Back to the (Pragmatic) Future
    Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2): 219-229. 2010.
    Sen argues that Rawls’ political theory suffers from the flaw of “institutional fundamentalism.” In response, he develops an alternate theory of justice that does not rely upon contractarian premises. I argue that Sen’s theory largely maps on to the insights of classic pragmatist thought. Further, the pragmatic tradition can help critique and supplement Sen’s project.
    The Nature of Justice
  •  34
    Law and economics
    Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2003.
    The Nature of Law and Legal SystemsIssues in the Philosophy of Economics
  •  138
    Dews, Dworks, and Poses Decide Lochner
    Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2): 15-44. 2010.
    Lochner represents a crucial case in American constitutional law. An investigation of the decision highlights important philosophical aspects of the place of law in a democratic society. Analysis of contemporary stances on Lochner, the actual Lochner opinion (including the dissents by Harlan and Holmes) and how judges following the legal philosophies of John Dewey, Ronald Dworkin and Richard Posner (“Dews,” “Dworks,” and “Poses”) would have decided the case shows that Dewey’s theory of law and d…Read more
    Lochner represents a crucial case in American constitutional law. An investigation of the decision highlights important philosophical aspects of the place of law in a democratic society. Analysis of contemporary stances on Lochner, the actual Lochner opinion (including the dissents by Harlan and Holmes) and how judges following the legal philosophies of John Dewey, Ronald Dworkin and Richard Posner (“Dews,” “Dworks,” and “Poses”) would have decided the case shows that Dewey’s theory of law and democracy emerges as the most attractive alternative.
    Philosophy of LawThe Nature of Law and Legal Systems
  • Thoreau, Maine and Fourier: Three Versions of Autonomy
    Humanities in the South 87 40-55. 2001.
    Political TheoryAutonomy, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback