• Law, Morality and Vietnam: The Peace Militants and the Courts
    with Rosemary S. Bannan
    Science and Society 40 (2): 252-256. 1976.
  •  58
    Merleau-Ponty and Metaphor
    Review of Metaphysics 47 (2): 370-370. 1993.
    Merleau-Ponty's work is replete with metaphors, so much so that one could believe that metaphor is his primary mode of philosophical expression. But he has never said that this is the case, at least not directly, and has in fact written very little specifically about metaphor. Perhaps taking his lead, commentators on Merleau-Ponty's work have also largely ignored metaphor. Jerry Gill has written a brief and careful book to look into this matter and to fill in whatever gap exists.
  •  137
    Why there is Something rather than Nothing
    Review of Metaphysics 59 (3): 679-679. 2006.
    This does not directly answer the “why” question, but the fact that it doesn’t allows for this volume’s central point: the question itself is meaningless. Meaning is found in our dealings with the physical universe and takes the form of language. It is the use of language—grammar—which provides the philosophical standard for ruling a question meaningful or meaningless. Language cannot, then, be meaningful if extended beyond the physical universe: to God, for example, or even to the material worl…Read more
  •  68
    Emotions and Biology: Remarks on the Contemporary Trend
    Review of Metaphysics 58 (2): 279-304. 2004.
    Damasio and LeDoux are neurobiologists, that is, brain scientists who work in the tradition begun by William James. I will introduce James from time to time for his historical importance and also because of the valuable schematization of the issues which his relatively uncomplicated view of the human organism allows. James considered what he was doing to be psychology, while Damasio and LeDoux regard themselves as biologists. James was also committed to understanding emotion strictly as a functi…Read more
  •  3071
    In 2020, Swedish theoretical physicist, Dr. Johan Hansson published a physics proof that our universe is superdeterministic meaning a predetermined static block universe without cause and effect in physics. This physics proof that cause and effect in physics are not real provides a new avenue of insight useful in the philosophy of religion. For example, superdeterminism provides circumstantial scientific evidence of the existence of God and our own immortality in our static block universe. The i…Read more