Quine Van

Suppose now that two philosophers, McX and I, differ over ontology. Suppose McX maintains there is something which I maintain there is not. McX can, quite consistently with his own point of view, describe our difference of opinion by saying that I refuse to recognize certain entities. I should protest of course that he is wrong in his formulation of our disagreement, for I maintain that there are no entities, of the kind which he alleges, for me to recognize; but my finding him wrong in his formulation of our disagreement is unimportant, for I am committed to considering him wrong in his ontology anyway. When I try to formulate our difference of opinion, on the other hand, I seem to be in a predicament. I cannot admit that there are some things which McX countenances and I do not, for in admitting that there are such things I should be contradicting my own rejection of them.

It is gratifying to see that philosophers' continued interest in Words and Objections has been so strong as to motivate a paperback edition. This is gratifying because it vindicates the editors' belief in the permanent im portance of Quine's philosophy and in the value of the papers com menting on it which were collected in our volume. Apart from a couple of small corrections, only one change has been made. The list of Professor Quine's writings has been brought up to date. The editors cannot claim any credit for this improvement, however. We have not tried to imitate the Library of Living Philosophers volumes and to include Professor Quine's autobiography in this volume, but we are fortunate to publish here his brand-new auto bibliography. 1975 THE EDITORS TABLE OF CONTENTS V PREFACE 1 EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION 1. 1. C. SMAR T / Quine's Philosophy of Science 3 GILBERT HARMAN / An Introduction to 'Translation and Meaning', Chapter Two of Word and Object 14 ERIK STENIUS / Beginning with Ordinary Things 27 NOAM CHOMSKY / Quine's Empirical Assumptions 53 1AAKKO HINTIKKA / Behavioral Criteria of Radical Translation 69 BARRY STROUD / Conventionalism and the Indeterminacy of Translation 82 P. F. STRA WSON / Singular Terms and Predication 97 118 H. P. GRICE / Vacuous Names P. T.

Willard van Orman Quine (1908-2000) est considere comme l'un des plus eminents representants de la philosophie analytique, notamment pour son approche holiste des theories scientifiques, pour sa these de la naturalisation de l'epistemologie, pour ses reflexions sur l'indetermination de la traduction ou encore pour sa critique des dogmes de l'empirisme. Dans Les voies du paradoxe (publie en 1966, puis revise et augmente en 1976), Quine choisit de regrouper des articles rediges sur une periode de quatre decennies (1934-1974). En alternant des contributions majeures et justement celebres avec de brefs articles de nature biographique ou pedagogique, le philosophe de Harvard brosse un tableau complet des themes qui ont traverse toute son oeuvre: nature et limite de la connaissance, theorie de la signification, critique du conventionnalisme, resolution des paradoxes logiques et semantiques, determination de l'engagement ontologique des theories, analyse des problemes logiques souleves par les modalites et les attitudes propositionnelles, etc. Au meme titre que Du point de vue logique et Relativite de l'ontologie, Les voies du paradoxe est ainsi l'un des plus importants recueils d'articles de Quine.