-
858What We Owe Past SelvesJournal of Applied Philosophy 40 (5): 936-950. 2023.Some say that we should respect the privacy of dead people. In this article, I take this idea for granted and use it to motivate the stronger claim that we sometimes ought to respect the privacy of our past selves.
-
81Why ‘Negative Control’ is a Dead End: A Reply to Mainz and UhrenfeldtRes Publica 27 (4): 661-667. 2021.Mainz and Uhrenfeldt have recently claimed that a violation of the right to privacy can be defined successfully under reliance on the notion of ‘Negative Control’. In this reply, I show that ‘Negative Control’ is unrelated to privacy right violations. It follows that control theorists have yet to put forth a successful normative account of privacy.
-
1239Treating people as individuals and as members of groupsPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 110 (1): 253-272. 2024.Many believe that we ought to treat people as individuals and that this form of treatment is in some sense incompatible with treating people as members of groups. Yet, the relation between these two kinds of treatments is elusive. In this paper, we develop a novel account of the normative requirement to treat people as individuals. According to this account, treating people as individuals requires treating people as agents in the appropriate capacity. We call this the Agency Attunement Account. …Read more
-
150The Right to Privacy, Control Over Self‐Presentation, and Subsequent HarmJournal of Applied Philosophy 37 (1): 141-154. 2020.Andrei Marmor has recently offered a narrow interpretation of the right to privacy as a right to having a reasonable amount of control over one's self‐presentation. He claims that the interest people have in preventing others from abusing their personal information to do harm is not directly protected by the right to privacy. This article rejects that claim and defends a view according to which concerns about abuse play a central role in fleshing out the appropriate scope of a general right to p…Read more
-
247Privacy rights and ‘naked’ statistical evidencePhilosophical Studies 178 (11): 3777-3795. 2021.Do privacy rights restrict what is permissible to infer about others based on statistical evidence? This paper replies affirmatively by defending the following symmetry: there is not necessarily a morally relevant difference between directly appropriating people’s private information—say, by using an X-ray device on their private safes—and using predictive technologies to infer the same content, at least in cases where the evidence has a roughly similar probative value. This conclusion is of the…Read more
-
Aarhus UniversityPost-doctoral Fellow
Aarhus, Denmark
Areas of Specialization
| Value Theory |
| Metaphysics and Epistemology |
Areas of Interest
| Value Theory |
| Metaphysics and Epistemology |