Jaime Nubiola

O trabalho acadêmico de Nathan Houser foi de extrema importância para o desenvolvimento dos estudos peircianos no mundo hispânico. Neste artigo, relembro meus primeiros contatos com o Professor Houser, minhas visitas ao Peirce Edition Project, em Indianápolis, sua visita ao Grupo de Estudios Peirceanos, em Navarra, e destaco seu apoio permanente ao desenvolvimento da pesquisa e do estudo do pensamento e da obra de Charles Sanders Peirce na Espanha, na Argentina e em outros países hispânicos. Em particular, gostaria de destacar algumas de suas virtudes, como seu rigor acadêmico, sua cordialidade e sua capacidade de acolher pessoas que nada sabiam, mas desejavam estudar Charles Sanders Peirce. Sem dúvida, Houser foi o mais eminente estudioso de Peirce nas últimas décadas. Em especial, gosto de recordar não apenas o painel “O Peirce Cosmopolita: o Impacto de sua Experiência Europeia”, que organizamos com Sara Barrena, Nathan Houser e eu durante o Congresso Internacional do Centenário de Charles S. Peirce, realizado em Lowell, Massachusetts, em 2014, mas também sua emocionante conferência memorial, intitulada “A Trágica Luta de Peirce com o Destino”, proferida naqueles dias na Igreja Episcopal de Santa Ana (St. Anne’s Episcopal Church), em Lowell.

El objetivo de este trabajo es de sugerir que la concepción de Charles S. Peirce de la razonabilidad, prepara el terreno a una comprensión más profunda de razón humana, que puede vencer la pobreza del naturalismo cienticista contemporáneo y de el posmodernismo escéptico. Proporcionamos un buen número de textos de Peirce, que testifican su concepción acerca de la razonabilidad que es en esencia la misma en su operación en el universo, en la naturaleza y en la mente humana. Una mención especial a Walker Percy y su defensa del enfoque de Peirce a la naturaleza triádica de nuestra actividad lingüística y nuestras prácticas comunicativas como una llave a una comprensión más integrada de razón humana, eso es, de la razonabilidad.

On March 12 and 13 of the year 2022 a tribute to Susan Haack was arranged at the School of Law of the University of Girona, Spain, on the occasion of her receiving the “I Premio Internacional de la Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica” [First International Award of Legal Culture] awarded to her in 2020. On those days the nightmare of the Covid disease was spreading rapidly across Europe, yet professor Haack remained undeterred by the risks. As editor Diego Dei Vecchi notes in the opening lines of the volume: “A week before the event, concern levels were considerably high. But none of this daunted Professor Haack, who remained steadfast in her willingness to travel to Girona, her friendly impetus for inexhaustible... Read More.

This contribution describes—with some documentary support from Peirce’s correspondence of his first and second European trips—Peirce’s conception of science as a collective and co-operative activity of all those whose lives are animated by the desire to find out the truth, whose lives are animated by “an impulse to penetrate into the reason of things.” The paper has two sections: first, Peirce as an inventor and builder of research instruments around which scientific communities are formed, and, second, Peirce’s own experience of cooperation within science.

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:The Cosmopolitan Peirce:The Impact of His European ExperienceJaime Nubiola, Guest EditorKeywordsCharles S. Peirce, Europe, ScienceThe common image of Charles Sanders Peirce as an isolated thinker writing in Arisbe without any contact with the world is not only historically inaccurate, but also makes it difficult to understand some key elements of his philosophy. Charles S. Peirce traveled to Europe on five different occasions. The five trips occurred between the years 1870 and 1883, all of them in the service of the Coast and Geodetic Survey, at that time the chief scientific agency of the United States. Those trips—which covered a total of thirty-eight months—were a rich mixture of scientific research and tourism, of communication with other scientists and also of enjoying the artistic treasures of Europe. The impact of this extensive travelling was so relevant in Peirce’s life and thought that it makes perfect sense to identify this period of time as his “cosmopolitan period”—to use Max Fisch’s expression (Fisch 1986, 227).Peirce’s experiences of his European trips are lively reflected in his broad correspondence (professional and family letters), which until now has been unduly neglected by the scholarship, due in part to the difficulties accompanying access to it and in part to the general lack of interest from the analytic tradition in the biographical aspects of philosophy. We are convinced that the feelings that Peirce experienced in Europe were seeds which bore fruit in later years. A close study of Peirce’s letters and other documents of those years will help in avoiding a number of misunderstandings about his thought and its evolution by highlighting his active participation in the first line of several fields of cooperative scientific research (astronomy, geodesy, etc.). [End Page 425]In this issue we collect three papers presented at the 2014 Charles S. Peirce International Centennial Congress, authored respectively by Nathan Houser, Sara Barrena and myself. The first paper, written by Nathan Houser, describes how Peirce’s European experiences influenced the development of his thought and helped shape his philosophy. It appears likely that his thought was decidedly influenced by his intellectual and personal contact with European scientists and philosophers. So to understand Peirce as an American philosopher it is necessary to grasp that he was profoundly influenced by European thought and culture and to inquire how his American and European experiences worked together to form his ideas and shape him into the world-renowned philosopher he became.Sara Barrena’s paper focuses on Peirce’s aesthetics. While Peirce claims to not be well acquainted with aesthetics, he always was interested in that field. In spite of the fact that Peirce did not develop the issue in depth, aesthetics is at the foundation of the other normative sciences. Barrena suggests that the trips through Europe and the contemplation of so many works of art and of historic places left in his memory impressions that are at the basis of the importance that Peirce would assign to art and aesthetics in his later years.The final paper, by Jaime Nubiola, describes—with documental support from Peirce’s correspondence from his first and second European trips—Peirce’s conception of science as a collective and cosoperative activity of people whose lives are animated by the desire to find out the truth and by “an impulse to penetrate into the reason of things” (CP 1.44, c.1896). The paper deals with Peirce as an inventor and builder of research instruments around which scientific communities are built, and with Peirce’s own experience of cooperation in science.In sum, a close study of Peirce’s letters and other documents of his “cosmopolitan period” will help avoid certain misunderstandings about his thought and its evolution, highlighting his active participation in the first line of several fields of cooperative scientific research (astronomy, geodesy, etc.). A better understanding of Peirce’s activity in those years will provide a richer and more sympathetic approach to him, and correct that all too common but inaccurate image of Peirce as an isolated thinker.Jaime Nubiola, Guest EditorUniversidad de Navarra [email protected], Charles S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders...