• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Thomas Schramme

Universität HamburgUniversity of Liverpool
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    36
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    4
  •  News and Updates
    36

 More details
  • Universität Hamburg
    Department of Philosophy
  • University of Liverpool
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Homepage
Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Areas of Interest
Applied Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
Social and Political Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (36)
  • Introduction: Moral Sentimentalism: Context and Critique
    with N. Roughley
    In Neil Roughley & T. Schramme (eds.), On Moral Sentimentalism, Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 1-18. 2015.
    Moral Emotivism and Sentimentalism
  • Psychische Krankheit als Störung wesentlicher Funktionen
    der Nervenarzt 86 (1): 16-21. 2015.
    Biomedical Ethics
  • Menschen mit Autismus als moralische Akteure
    In E. V. Autismus Deutschland (ed.), Autismus im Spekturm von Forschung und Gesellschaft, Loeper Verlag. pp. 350-362. 2014.
    Autism
  • Einführung in die Praktische Philosophie
    Metzler. forthcoming.
    Applied Ethics, Miscellaneous
  •  129
    Being a (A-)moral Person and Caring About Morality
    In Being Amoral: Psychopathy and Moral Incapacity, Mit Press. pp. 227-244. 2014.
    The chapter starts from a specific interpretation of what it means to know the difference between right and wrong, which stems from Gilbert Ryle. To know the difference between right and wrong implies caring about morality. The author links Ryle’s ideas to the notion of being a moral person. Two different ideas found in moral philosophy are delineated, namely, the amoral person, that is, someone who rejects the demands of morality, and the morally incapacitated person, that is, someone who canno…Read more
    The chapter starts from a specific interpretation of what it means to know the difference between right and wrong, which stems from Gilbert Ryle. To know the difference between right and wrong implies caring about morality. The author links Ryle’s ideas to the notion of being a moral person. Two different ideas found in moral philosophy are delineated, namely, the amoral person, that is, someone who rejects the demands of morality, and the morally incapacitated person, that is, someone who cannot take those demands into account. Psychopaths are not amoral in the philosophers’ sense of the word, but are incapable of, or seriously deficient in, taking the moral point of view.
    AmoralistsPsychopathy and Moral Psychology
  • The Body as Source of Prudential Value
    In S. Schleidgen (ed.), Human Nature and Self Design, Mentis. pp. 67-81. 2012.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback