• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Simon Beck

University of the Western Cape
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    36
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    33

 More details
  • University of the Western Cape
    Philosophy
    Professor
University of Cape Town
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1994
Bellville, South Africa
0000-0002-5332-7600
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Mind
Areas of Interest
Metaphilosophy
Philosophy of Action
Metaphysics and Epistemology
  • All publications (36)
  •  917
    Counterfactuals and the law
    South African Journal of Philosophy 12 (3). 1993.
    This article is concerned with the place counterfactual reasoning occupies in South African law, and how philosophy might be able to help the law. I point out some of the more important and unavoidable uses of counterfactual reasoning in our law. Following this I make some suggestions as to how philosophy, and especially informal logic, can be of help to the law. Finally, I make some suggestions as to how the law in turn can help philosophy.
    Legal Reasoning and Adjudication, Misc
  •  249
    Should we tolerate people who split?
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1): 1-17. 1992.
    Thought-experiments in which one person divides into two have been important in the literature on personal identity. I consider three influential arguments which aim to undermine the force of these thought-experiments – arguments from David Wiggins, Patricia Kitcher and Kathleen Wilkes. I argue that all three fail, leaving us to face the consequences of splitting, whatever those may be.
    Psychological Theories of Personal IdentityFission and Split BrainsThought Experiments in Personal I…Read more
    Psychological Theories of Personal IdentityFission and Split BrainsThought Experiments in Personal IdentityPuzzle Cases in Personal Identity, Misc
  •  125
    Intuitionism, Constructive Interpretation, and Cricket
    Philosophical Papers 37 (2): 319-331. 2008.
    This paper is a re-reading of Colin Radford's paper 'The Umpire's Dilemma', published in Analysis in 1985. It argues that Radford's dilemma has been unjustly ignored and has interesting (and problematic) implications for both intuitionism and Ronald Dworkin's constructive interpretationist jurisprudence.
    Philosophy of Law, MiscEpistemology, MiscPhilosophy of SportIntuitionism and Constructivism
  •  1123
    Our Identity, Responsibility and Biology
    Philosophical Papers 3-14. 2004.
    Eric Olson argues in The Human Animal that thought-experiments involving body-swapping do not in the end offer any support to psychological continuity theories, nor do they pose any threat to his Biological View. I argue that he is mistaken in at least the second claim.
    What Matters in SurvivalThought Experiments in Personal IdentityBrain Transplants
  •  3182
    Transplant Thought-Experiments: Two costly mistakes in discounting them
    South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (2): 189-199. 2014.
    ‘Transplant’ thought-experiments, in which the cerebrum is moved from one body to another, have featured in a number of recent discussions in the personal identity literature. Once taken as offering confirmation of some form of psychological continuity theory of identity, arguments from Marya Schechtman and Kathleen Wilkes have contended that this is not the case. Any such apparent support is due to a lack of detail in their description or a reliance on predictions that we are in no position to …Read more
    ‘Transplant’ thought-experiments, in which the cerebrum is moved from one body to another, have featured in a number of recent discussions in the personal identity literature. Once taken as offering confirmation of some form of psychological continuity theory of identity, arguments from Marya Schechtman and Kathleen Wilkes have contended that this is not the case. Any such apparent support is due to a lack of detail in their description or a reliance on predictions that we are in no position to make. I argue that the case against them rests on two serious misunderstandings of the operation of thought-experiments, and that even if they do not ultimately support a psychological continuity theory, they do major damage to that theory’s opponents.
    Personal Identity, MiscPsychological Theories of Personal IdentityThought Experiments in Personal Id…Read more
    Personal Identity, MiscPsychological Theories of Personal IdentityThought Experiments in Personal IdentityBrain TransplantsPuzzle Cases in Personal Identity, Misc
  •  1438
    Morals, Metaphysics and the Method of Cases
    South African Journal of Philosophy 29 (4): 332-342. 2010.
    In this paper I discuss a set of problems concerning the method of cases as it is used in applied ethics and in the metaphysical debate about personal identity. These problems stem from research in social psychology concerning our access to the data with which the method operates. I argue that the issues facing ethics are more worrying than those facing metaphysics.
    Meta-Ethics, MiscPersonal Identity, MiscThought Experiments in Personal IdentityPersonal Identity an…Read more
    Meta-Ethics, MiscPersonal Identity, MiscThought Experiments in Personal IdentityPersonal Identity and Applied Ethics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback