-
64Naturalism’s Perils, Naturalism’s Promises: A Comment on Appiah’s Experiments in EthicsNeuroethics 3 (3): 215-222. 2010.In his Experiments in Ethics, Appiah focuses mostly on the dimension of naturalism as a naturalism of deprivation - naturalism’s apparent robbing us of aspects of the world that we had held dear. The aim of this paper is to remind him of that naturalism has a dimension of plenitude as well - its capacity to enrich our conception of the world as well. With regard to character, we argue that scientific psychology can help provide a conception of character as dynamic, in a way that may preserve man…Read more
-
58Naturalism and intuitions: Commentary on Steven Hales, relativism and the foundations of philosophyInternational Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2). 2008.This Article does not have an abstract
-
52Two uneliminated uses for “concepts”: Hybrids and guides for inquiryBehavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3): 211-212. 2010.Machery's case against hybrids rests on a principle that is too strong, even by his own lights. And there are likely important generalizations to be made about hybrids, if they do exist. Moreover, even if there were no important generalizations about concepts themselves, the term picks out an important class of entities and should be retained to help guide inquiry
-
511. The puzzle (s) of imaginative resistanceIn Elisabeth Schellekens & Peter Goldie (eds.), The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology, Oxford University Press. pp. 239. 2011.
-
49Jackson's Empirical AssumptionsPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3): 637-643. 2001.Frank Jackson has given us an elegant and important book. It is, by a long shot, the most sophisticated defense of the use of conceptual analysis in philosophy that has ever been offered. But we also we find it a rather perplexing book, for we can’t quite figure out what Jackson thinks a conceptual analysis is. And until we get clearer on that, we’re not at all sure that conceptual analysis, as Jackson envisions it, is possible. The main reason for our perplexity is that Jackson seems to be maki…Read more
-
40Living with innateness (and environmental dependence too)Philosophical Psychology 21 (3). 2008.Griffiths and Machery contend that the concept of innateness should be dispensed with in the sciences. We contend that, once that concept is properly understood as what we have called 'closed process invariance', it is still of significant use in the sciences, especially cognitive science.
-
32Experimentalist Rationalism, or Why It's OK if the A Priori Is Only 99.44 Percent Empirically PureIn Albert Casullo & Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), The a Priori in Philosophy, Oxford University Press. pp. 92. 2013.
-
28What is evaluative normativity, that we (maybe) should avoid it?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5): 274-275. 2011.Elqayam & Evans (E&E) argue that we should avoid evaluative normativity in our psychological theorizing. But there are two crucial issues lacking clarity in their presentation of evaluative normativity. One of them can be resolved through disambiguation, but the other points to a deeper problem: Evaluative normativity is too tightly-woven in our theorizing to be easily disentangled and discarded
-
24Attentional Engines: A Perceptual Theory of the ArtsJournal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (1): 121-124. 2022.
-
24Supplementing Herder’s Naturalism: Expanding the Senses and Transcending CulturesJournal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (2): 234-238. 2022.
-
15Going Positive by Going NegativeIn Justin Sytsma & Wesley Buckwalter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, Wiley. 2016.The larger philosophical world has on the whole turned from a mix of averted gaze and outright antipathy toward x‐phi, to a mix of grudging acceptance and enthusiastic embrace. This chapter explains that the experimental philosophy is relevant, and that it is dangerous, and explains some ways that people can do more to remain both. Experimental philosophy's semi‐official sigil of the burning armchair has advertised its dangerousness for the past decade and a half as well. The chapter explains th…Read more
-
15Hard domains, biased rationalizations, and unanswered empirical questionsBehavioral and Brain Sciences 43. 2020.Cushman raises the intriguing possibility that rationalization accesses/constructs intuitions that are not otherwise cognitively available. However, he substantially over-reaches in arguing that rationalization is mostly right on average, based on claims that the process must have emerged adaptively. The adaptiveness of “bounded rationalization” is domain specific and is unlikely to be adaptive in a large number of important applications.
-
4The Challenge of Sticking with Intuitions through Thick and ThinIn Booth Anthony Robert & P. Rowbottom Darrell (eds.), Intuitions, Oxford University Press. 2014.Philosophical discussions often involve appeals to verdicts about particular cases, sometimes actual, more often hypothetical, and usually with little or no substantive argument in their defense. Philosophers — on both sides of debates over the standing of this practice — have often called the basis for such appeals ‘intuitions’. But, what might such ‘intuitions’ be, such that they could legitimately serve these purposes? Answers vary, ranging from ‘thin’ conceptions that identify intuitions as …Read more
-
3Configuring the Cognitive ImaginationIn Kathleen Stock & Katherine Thomsen-Jones (eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics, Palgrave-macmillan. pp. 203-223. 2008.
-
3Intuitions: An a Posteriori Critique of the a PrioriDissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. 2002.This dissertation defends an epistemology that is simultaneously naturalistic---partaking of a consistently scientific worldview---and rationalistic---admitting of the existence of a priori justification. To attain such a naturalistic rationalism , we need to acknowledge that the unconscious structure of our inferential and intuition-producing mechanisms may be relevant to the justificatory status of our cognitions. Such an acknowledgement first requires admitting a limited version of epistemolo…Read more
-
2Accentuate the NegativeIn Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy: Volume 2, Oxford University Press Usa. 2013.There are two ways of understanding experimental philosophy's process of appealing to intuitions as evidence for or against philosophical claims: the positive and negative programs. This chapter deals with how the positivist method of conceptual analysis is affected by the results of the negative program. It begins by describing direct extramentalism, semantic mentalism, conceptual mentalism, and mechanist mentalism, all of which argue that intuitions are credible sources of evidence and will th…Read more
-
The prospects for an experimentalist rationalism, or why it's OK if the a priori is only 99.44 percent emprically pureIn Albert Casullo & Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), The a Priori in Philosophy, Oxford University Press Uk. 2013.
-
Bealer, G. (1998). “Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy,” in M. DePaul & W. Ramsey, eds., Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
-
Are aestheticians' intuitions sitting pretty?In Florian Cova & Sébastien Réhault (eds.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Aesthetics, Bloomsbury Academic. 2018.
-
What's epistemology for? The case for neopragmatism in normative metaepistemologyIn Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures, Clarendon Press. 2006.
-
The Promise of Experimental Philosophy and the Inference to SignalIn James R. Beebe (ed.), Advances in Experimental Epistemology, Bloomsbury. pp. 193-207. 2014.
-
Regress-stopping and disagreement for epistemic neopragmatistsIn David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology, Oxford University Press Uk. 2015.
-
Normativity and Epistemic InstitutionsIn Joshua Michael Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy, Oup Usa. 2008.
Tucson, Arizona, United States of America