-
249On Hylemorphism and Personal IdentityEuropean Journal of Philosophy 19 (3): 454-473. 2009.Abstract: There is no such thing as ‘the’ hylemorphic account of personal identity. There are several views that count as hylemorphic, and these views can be grouped into two main families—the corruptionist view, and the survivalist view. The differentiating factor is that the corruptionist view holds that the persistence of the soul is not sufficient for the persistence of the person, while the survivalist view holds that the persistence of the soul is sufficient for the persistence of the pers…Read more
-
274Hylemorphic animalismPhilosophical Studies 155 (1). 2011.Roughly, animalism is the doctrine that each of us is identical with an organism. This paper explains and defends a hylemorphic version of animalism. I show how hylemorphic animalism handles standard objections to animalism in compelling ways. I also show what the costs of endorsing hylemorphic animalism are. The paper's contention is that despite the costs, the view is worth taking seriously
-
50An Old Argument Against Co-locationMetaphysica 8 (1): 45-51. 2007.I defend an old argument against co-location—the view that human animals are distinct from, but co-located with human persons. The argument is drawn from St. Thomas Aquinas. In order to respond to the argument, co-locationists have to endorse at least one of a trio of claims, none of which is obviously correct. Further, two of the options do not seem to be the sort of positions that should be flowing out of the acceptance of a general metaphysical position. I conclude that co-locationism is more…Read more
-
110St. Thomas Aquinas on the Problem of Too Many ThinkersModern Schoolman 89 (3-4): 209-222. 2012.It has been argued that St. Thomas Aquinas’s anthropological views fall prey to the problem of “Too Many Thinkers.” The worry, roughly, is that his views entail that I—a human person—am able to think, but that my soul—which is not a human person—is also able to think. Hence, too many thinkers: there are too many ofus having my thoughts. In this paper, I show why this is not a problem for St. Thomas. Along the way, I also address Peter Unger’s argument for substance dualism.
-
27Objectivist AtheologyJournal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2). 2007.Objectivists insist on the primacy of existence—the axiom that existence exists. This axiom is taken to entail that the universe exists independent of any consciousness, human or divine. Objectivists hold that a straightforward consequence of this axiom is that God does not exist. The central argument of this paper is that the Objectivist atheological argument based on the primacy of existence fails. Atheological arguments based on the alleged incoherence of the Divine attributes are at best inc…Read more
-
169Emergent substancePhilosophical Studies 141 (3). 2008.In this paper, I develop an ontological position according to which substances such as you and I have no substantial parts. The claim is not that we are immaterial souls. Nor is the claim that we are “human atoms” co-located with human organisms. It is, rather, that we are macrophysical objects that are, in the relevant sense, simple. I contend that despite initial appearances, this claim is not obviously false, and I defend it by showing how much work it can do.
-
36Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. By Edward FeserAmerican Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2): 340-342. 2015.
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics |
Philosophy of Religion |
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy |
Areas of Interest
Aesthetics |