• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Mieszko Tałasiewicz

University of Warsaw
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    40
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    7

 More details
  • University of Warsaw
    Faculty of Philosophy
    Professor
University of Warsaw
Institute of Philosophy
PhD, 1999
Warsaw, Poland
0000-0003-1933-4759
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Metaphilosophy
1 more
  • All publications (40)
  •  26
    Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Warsaw University: Studies and Contributions to the 11th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Kraków (Cracow) August 20-26, 1999 (edited book, review)
    Wydawn. Nauk. Semper. 2002.
    History of Science, MiscPolish PhilosophyScientific Method, MiscellaneousPhilosophy of Science, Misc…Read more
    History of Science, MiscPolish PhilosophyScientific Method, MiscellaneousPhilosophy of Science, MiscellaneousLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  488
    A New Perspective for the Theory of Intentionality
    In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical and Formal Approaches to Linguistic Analysis, De Gruyter. pp. 513-526. 2012.
    Intentionality
  •  34
    The core of grammar
    Semiotica 2012 (188). 2012.
    Semiotics
  • O pojęciu „racjonalności” (II)
    Filozofia Nauki 3. 1995.
    The paper is divided into two parts. Part one (published in Filozofia Nauki, no 1-2/1995) contains revies of main types of rationality that can be found in literature, and an attempt to point out various relations among these types. Part two is devoted to analysis of some issues concerning detailed problems of rationality (e.g.: How to define rationality? Is rationality decidable? Does it come in degrees?).
    Rationality
  •  130
    Do we need a new theory of truthmaking? Some comments on Disjunction Thesis, Conjunction Thesis, Entailment Principle and explanation
    with Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Wojciech Wciórka, and Piotr Wilkin
    Philosophical Studies 165 (2): 591-604. 2013.
    In the paper we discuss criticisms against David Armstrong’s general theory of truthmaking by Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, Peter Schulte and Benjamin Schnieder, and conclude that Armstrong’s theory survives these criticisms. Special attention is given to the problems concerning Entailment Principle, Conjunction Thesis, Disjunction Thesis and to the notion of explanation
    Truthmakers
  •  2
    Pragmatyczna koncepcja nieostrości
    Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 41 (1): 101-113. 2002.
  •  28
    Można w coś wierzyć! (polemika z książką Bogdana Chwedeńczuka, „Trzeba w coś wierzyć?”)
    Etyka 30 200-211. 1997.
  • Analiza semantyczno-kategorialna. Badanie gramatyczności, czy ustalanie sensu
    Filozofia Nauki 1. 2001.
    In the paper the author tries to show that semantico-categorial analysis in the traditional Ajdukiewiczian application as a tool of evaluating semantic completeness of complex expressions is ineffective. There is, however, another application, to which the analysis is much better fitted. Namely, it allows to precisify the actual uses of natural language - in all those cases in which on the one hand precision is a superior value, and on the other hand, the formalisation is not possible and one ha…Read more
    In the paper the author tries to show that semantico-categorial analysis in the traditional Ajdukiewiczian application as a tool of evaluating semantic completeness of complex expressions is ineffective. There is, however, another application, to which the analysis is much better fitted. Namely, it allows to precisify the actual uses of natural language - in all those cases in which on the one hand precision is a superior value, and on the other hand, the formalisation is not possible and one has to stay within natural language. Obviously, in order to achieve this aim many particular problems, sometimes not at all trivial, have to be solved. Amongst the most important the author sees determining a binding canon of the rules of analysis and determining pragmatic criteria of the admissibility of paraphrases and of filling in ellipses
  • Własność i znaczenie
    Studia Semiotyczne 25 165-185. 2004.
  • On the Concept of Rationality
    Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 89 485-503. 2006.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback