•  86
    Beyond polling alone: The quest for an informed public
    Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3): 157-165. 2006.
    Converse's seminal 1964 article explored three crucial limitations of public opinion as it is revealed in conventional polls: information levels, belief systems, and nonattitudes. These limitations are significant from the standpoint of democratic theory, but it is possible to design forms of public consultation and of social‐science research that will reveal what public opinion might be like if these limitations were somehow overcome. Deliberative Polling is an effort to explore the contours of…Read more
  • Philosophy, Politics and Society, Sixth Series: Justice between Age Groups and Generations
    with Peter Laslett and Heyd David
    Environmental Values 2 (2): 187-188. 1993.
  •  109
    Why Deliberative Polling? Reply to Gleason
    Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (3): 393-403. 2011.
    ABSTRACT Contrary to Laurel Gleason's assertions, Deliberative Polling among random samples is not a process that is dominated by “experts” or by certain categories of deliberator; it produces genuine gains among the participants in knowledge of information that has been verified as true and relevant; it does not cause ideological polarization; and it is not intended as a substitute for, rather than a supplement to, deliberation on the part of the general public.
  •  50
    Justifying Liberty
    Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 7 176-191. 1985.