• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Franco V. Trivigno

University of Oslo
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    33
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    4

 More details
  • University of Oslo
    Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas
    Professor
Boston University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2007
Areas of Specialization
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Plato
Aristotle
Normative Ethics
Virtue Ethics
Well-Being
1 more
Areas of Interest
Normative Ethics
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
History of Western Philosophy
Plato
Aristotle
Virtue Ethics
Well-Being
2 more
  • All publications (33)
  • Paratragedy in Plato’s Gorgias
    Oxfrod Studies in Ancient Philosophy 36 73-105. 2009.
    PlatoPlato: Gorgias
  •  101
    Sophistic Argument (C.W.) Tindale Reason's Dark Champions. Constructive Strategies of Sophistic Argument. Pp. xiv + 178. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press, 2010. Cased, US$49.95. ISBN: 978-1-57003-878-5 (review)
    The Classical Review 61 (2): 415-417. 2011.
    Ancient Greek and Roman Logic
  •  232
    Childish Nonsense? The Value of Interpretation in Plato’s Protagoras
    Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (4): 509-543. 2013.
    In the Protagoras, Plato presents us with a Puzzle regarding the value of interpretation. On the one hand, Socrates claims to find several familiar Socratic theses about morality and the human condition in his interpretation of a poem by Simonides (339e−347a). On the other hand, immediately after the interpretation, Socrates castigates the whole task of interpretation as “childish nonsense” appropriate for second-rate drinking parties (347d5−6).1 The core problem is this: taking Socrates’s inter…Read more
    In the Protagoras, Plato presents us with a Puzzle regarding the value of interpretation. On the one hand, Socrates claims to find several familiar Socratic theses about morality and the human condition in his interpretation of a poem by Simonides (339e−347a). On the other hand, immediately after the interpretation, Socrates castigates the whole task of interpretation as “childish nonsense” appropriate for second-rate drinking parties (347d5−6).1 The core problem is this: taking Socrates’s interpretation of Simonides seriously requires undermining the significance of the claims about interpretation, but taking the criticism of interpretation seriously requires undermining the significance of Socrates’s ..
    History of Western PhilosophyPlato's Works
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback