-
527MemoryIn Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa & Matthias Steup (eds.), A Companion to Epistemology (Second Edition), Wiley-blackwell. 2010.
-
847Harman, negative coherentism, and the problem of ongoing justificationPhilosophia 24 (3-4): 271-294. 1995.
-
378Trusting Lucy: Believing the IncredibleIn Gregory Bassham & Jerry L. Walls (eds.), The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy, Open Court. 2005.
-
34Rationality and Religious Commitment by Robert Audi (Oxford University Press), $45/£ 25The Philosophers' Magazine 57 113-114. 2012.
-
1071Incarnation, Timelessness, and Leibniz's Law ProblemsIn Gregory E. Ganssle & David M. Woodruff (eds.), God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature, Oxford University Press. 2002.
-
184Justified Belief and Demon WorldsRes Philosophica 90 (2): 203-214. 2013.The New Demon World Objection claims that reliabilist accounts of justification are mistaken because there are justified empirical beliefs at demon worlds— worlds at which the subjects are systematically deceived by a Cartesian demon. In this paper, I defend strongly verific (but not necessarily reliabilist) accounts of justification by claiming that there are two ways to construct a theory of justification: by analyzing our ordinary concept of justification or by taking justification to be a th…Read more
-
552On Privileging God's Moral GoodnessFaith and Philosophy 23 (4): 409-422. 2006.According to Eric Funkhouser, omnipotence and necessary moral perfection (what Funkhouser calls "impeccability") are not compatible. Funkhouser gives two arguments for this claim. In this paper, I argue that neither of Funkhouser's arguments is sound. The traditional theist can reasonably claim that, contra Funkhouser, (i) there is no possible being who possesses all of God's attributes sans impeccability, and (ii) the fact that there are things that God cannot do does not entail that God lacks …Read more
-
553The real presence of an eternal GodIn Kevin Timpe & Eleonore Stump (eds.), Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump, Routledge. 2009.
-
1Charles Taliaferro, Consciousness and the Mind of God (review)Philosophy in Review 15 428-430. 1995.
-
809Two factor theories, meaning wholism and intentionalistic psychology: A reply to FodorPhilosophical Psychology 5 (2): 133-151. 1992.In the third chapter of his book Psychosemantics , Jerry A. Fodor argues that the truth of meaning holism (the thesis that the content of a psychological state is determined by the totality of that state's epistemic liaisons) would be fatal for intentionalistic psychology. This is because holism suggests that no two people are ever in the same intentional state, and so a psychological theory that generalizes over such states will be composed of generalizations which fail to generalize. Fodor the…Read more
-
4725The prima/ultima facie justification distinction in epistemologyPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (3): 551-566. 1996.
-
702Review of Matthias Steup (ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (3). 2002.
-
1222In this paper I argue for a version of the Total Evidence view according to which the rational response to disagreement depends upon one's total evidence. I argue that perceptual evidence of a certain kind is significantly weightier than many other types of evidence, including testimonial. Furthermore, what is generally called "The Uniqueness Thesis" is actually a conflation of two distinct principles that I dub "Evidential Uniqueness" and "Rationality Uniqueness." The former principle is likely…Read more
-
20JL Schellenberg, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 15 (1): 63-65. 1995.
-
1001God, Supernatural Kinds, and the IncarnationReligious Studies 27 (3): 353-370. 1991.Traditionally, the term ’God’ has been understood either as a proper name or as a description. However, according to a new view, the term God’ in a sentence like "Jesus Christ is God" functions as a kind term, much as the term ’tiger’ functions in the sentence "Tigger is a tiger." In this paper I examine the claim that divinity can be construed as a ’supernatural’ kind, developing the outlines of an account of the semantics of God’ along these lines, and suggest that it might solve an important …Read more
-
2202Defending Divine FreedomIn L. Kvanvig Jonathan (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Oxford University Press. pp. 168-95. 2013.
-
1210The IncarnationIn Chad Meister & Paul Copan (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, Routledge Press. 2007.
-
927The Incarnation and the TrinityIn Michael J. Murray (ed.), Reason for the Hope Within, Wm. B. Eerdmans. 1999.
-
2128On the Tenability of Brute Naturalism and the Implications of Brute TheismPhilosophia Christi 10 (2): 273-280. 2010.Timothy O’Connor’s book Theism and Ultimate Explanation offers a defense of a new version of the cosmological argument. In his discussion, O’Connor argues against the coherence of a brute fact “explanation” of the universe and for the claim that the God of theism cannot be logically contingent. In this paper, I take issue with both of these arguments. Regarding the former, I claim that contrary to what O’Connor asserts, we have no good reason to prefer an account according to which the universe …Read more
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Religion |
Areas of Interest
Epistemology |
Metaphysics |
Philosophy of Mind |
Philosophy of Religion |
PhilPapers Editorships
Philosophy of Religion |