• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Jeffrey Paris

University of Manchester
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    70
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    24

 More details
  • University of Manchester
    Regular Faculty
Areas of Interest
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Probability
  • All publications (70)
  •  91
    Six Problems in Pure Inductive Logic
    with A. Vencovská
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (4): 731-747. 2019.
    We present six significant open problems in Pure Inductive Logic, together with their background and current status, with the intention of raising awareness and leading ultimately to their resolution.
    Logics
  •  134
    Symmetry’s End?
    with A. Vencovská
    Erkenntnis 74 (1): 53-67. 2011.
    We examine the idea that similar problems should have similar solutions (to paraphrase van Fraassen’s slogan ‘Problems which are essentially the same must receive essentially the same solution’, see van Fraassen in Laws and symmetry, Oxford Univesity Press, Oxford, 1989, p. 236) in the context of symmetries of sentence algebras within Inductive Logic and conclude that by itself this is too generous a notion upon which to found the rational assignment of probabilities. We also argue that within o…Read more
    We examine the idea that similar problems should have similar solutions (to paraphrase van Fraassen’s slogan ‘Problems which are essentially the same must receive essentially the same solution’, see van Fraassen in Laws and symmetry, Oxford Univesity Press, Oxford, 1989, p. 236) in the context of symmetries of sentence algebras within Inductive Logic and conclude that by itself this is too generous a notion upon which to found the rational assignment of probabilities. We also argue that within our formulation of symmetry the paradoxes associated with the so called ‘Principle of Indifference’ collapse, but only to be replaced by genuinely irremediable examples of the same phenomenon
    Indifference Principles
  •  129
    Proof systems for probabilistic uncertain reasoning
    with A. Vencovska
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3): 1007-1039. 1998.
    The paper describes and proves completeness theorems for a series of proof systems formalizing common sense reasoning about uncertain knowledge in the case where this consists of sets of linear constraints on a probability function
    Epistemic LogicNonclassical LogicsMathematical Logic
  •  175
    On parameter free induction schemas
    with R. Kaye and C. Dimitracopoulos
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4): 1082-1097. 1988.
    We present a comprehensive study of the axiom schemas IΣ - n , BΣ - n (induction and collection schemas for parameter free Σ n formulas) and some closely related schemas
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic
  • Predicate Exchangeability and Language Invariance in Pure Inductive Logic
    with M. S. Kliess
    Logique Et Analyse 57 (228): 513-540. 2014.
    In Pure Inductive Logic, the rational principle of Predicate Exchangeability states that permuting the predicates in a given language L and replacing each occurrence of a predicate in an L-sentence phi according to this permutation should not change our belief in the truth of phi. In this paper we study when a prior probability function w on a purely unary language L satisfying Predicate Exchangeability also satisfies the principle of Unary Language Invariance.
    Subjective Probability, MiscInductive LogicProbabilistic Principles, MiscLogical Probability
  •  113
    On the scheme of induction for bounded arithmetic formulas
    with A. J. Wilkie
    Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 35 (C): 261-302. 1987.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicProof TheoryModel Theory
  •  148
    On LP -models of arithmetic
    with A. Sirokofskich
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (1): 212-226. 2008.
    We answer some problems set by Priest in [11] and [12], in particular refuting Priest's Conjecture that all LP-models of Th(N) essentially arise via congruence relations on classical models of Th(N). We also show that the analogue of Priest's Conjecture for I δ₀ + Exp implies the existence of truth definitions for intervals [0,a] ⊂ₑ M ⊨ I δ₀ + Exp in any cut [0,a] ⊂e K ⊆ M closed under successor and multiplication
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicModel Theory
  •  183
    A Note on Priest's Finite Inconsistent Arithmetics
    with N. Pathmanathan
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (5): 529-537. 2006.
    We give a complete characterization of Priest's Finite Inconsistent Arithmetics observing that his original putative characterization included arithmetics which cannot in fact be realized
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicNonclassical LogicsParaconsistent Logic
  •  79
    An examination of the SEP candidate analogical inference rule within pure inductive logic
    with E. Howarth and A. Vencovská
    Journal of Applied Logic 14 (C): 22-45. 2016.
    Subjective Probability, MiscProbabilistic Principles, MiscLogical ProbabilityInductive Logic
  •  40
    Pure Inductive Logic
    with Alena Vencovská
    Cambridge University Press. 2011.
    Pure Inductive Logic is the study of rational probability treated as a branch of mathematical logic. This monograph, the first devoted to this approach, brings together the key results from the past seventy years, plus the main contributions of the authors and their collaborators over the last decade, to present a comprehensive account of the discipline within a single unified context.
    Subjective Probability, MiscLogical ProbabilityInductive LogicProbabilistic Principles, Misc
  •  1205
    The Counterpart Principle of Analogical Support by Structural Similarity
    with Alexandra Hill
    Erkenntnis 79 (S6): 1-16. 2014.
    We propose and investigate an Analogy Principle in the context of Unary Inductive Logic based on a notion of support by structural similarity which is often employed to motivate scientific conjectures.
    Subjective Probability, MiscProbabilistic Principles, MiscCounterpart Theory
  •  53
    The emergence of reasons conjecture
    with A. Vencovská
    Journal of Applied Logic 1 (3-4): 167-195. 2003.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  49
    Deriving Information from Inconsistent Knowledge Bases: A Completeness Theorem for η▹η
    Logic Journal of the IGPL 12 (5): 345-353. 2004.
    The logical consequence relations η▹η provide a very attractive way of inferring new facts from inconsistent knowledge bases without compromising standards of credibility. In this short note we provide proof theories and completeness theorems for these consequence relations which may have some applicability in small examples
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsAreas of Mathematics
  •  153
    A Continuum of Inductive Methods Arising from a Generalized Principle of Instantial Relevance
    with C. J. Nix
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (1): 83-115. 2006.
    In this paper we consider a natural generalization of the Principle of Instantial Relevance and give a complete characterization of the probabilistic belief functions satisfying this principle as a family of discrete probability functions parameterized by a single real δ ∊ [0, 1)
    Epistemic LogicProbabilistic Principles
  •  96
    Maximum Entropy Inference with Quantified Knowledge
    with Owen Barnett
    Logic Journal of the IGPL 16 (1): 85-98. 2008.
    We investigate uncertain reasoning with quantified sentences of the predicate calculus treated as the limiting case of maximum entropy inference applied to finite domains.
    Indifference PrinciplesMaximum Entropy Principles
  •  913
    Second Order Inductive Logic and Wilmers' Principle
    with M. S. Kliess
    Journal of Applied Logic 12 (4): 462-476. 2014.
    We extend the framework of Inductive Logic to Second Order languages and introduce Wilmers' Principle, a rational principle for probability functions on Second Order languages. We derive a representation theorem for functions satisfying this principle and investigate its relationship to the first order principles of Regularity and Super Regularity.
    Subjective Probability, MiscProbabilistic Principles, MiscInductive LogicLogical Probability
  •  153
    Provability of the pigeonhole principle and the existence of infinitely many primes
    with A. J. Wilkie and A. R. Woods
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4): 1235-1244. 1988.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  136
    A note on the undefinability of cuts
    with C. Dimitracopoulos
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3): 564-569. 1983.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicProof Theory
  •  108
    The theory of spectrum exchangeability
    with E. Howarth
    Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (1): 108-130. 2015.
    Spectrum Exchangeability, Sx, is an irrelevance principle of Pure Inductive Logic, and arguably the most natural extension of Atom Exchangeability to polyadic languages. It has been shown1that all probability functions which satisfy Sx are comprised of a mixture of two essential types of probability functions; heterogeneous and homogeneous functions. We determine the theory of Spectrum Exchangeability, which for a fixed languageLis the set of sentences ofLwhich must be assigned probability 1 by …Read more
    Spectrum Exchangeability, Sx, is an irrelevance principle of Pure Inductive Logic, and arguably the most natural extension of Atom Exchangeability to polyadic languages. It has been shown1that all probability functions which satisfy Sx are comprised of a mixture of two essential types of probability functions; heterogeneous and homogeneous functions. We determine the theory of Spectrum Exchangeability, which for a fixed languageLis the set of sentences ofLwhich must be assigned probability 1 by every probability function satisfying Sx, by examining separately the theories of heterogeneity and homogeneity. We find that the theory of Sx is equal to the theory of finite structures, i.e., those sentences true in all finite structures forL, and it emerges that Sx is inconsistent with the principle of Super-Regularity. As a further consequence we are able to characterize those probability functions which satisfy Sx and the Finite Values Property.
    Probabilistic Principles, MiscSubjective Probability, MiscInductive LogicLogical Probability
  •  211
    European summer meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, Manchester, England, 1984
    with P. Aczel, A. J. Wilkie, G. M. Wilmers, and C. E. M. Yates
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (2): 480-502. 1986.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Misc
  •  16
    Principles of Remembering and Forgetting
    with E. Howarth
    Logique Et Analyse 57 (228): 489-511. 2014.
    We propose two principles of inductive reasoning related to how observed information is handled by conditioning, and justify why they may be said to represent aspects of rational reasoning. A partial classification is given of the probability functions which satisfy these principles.
    Subjective Probability, MiscProbabilistic Principles, MiscLogical ProbabilityInductive Logic
  •  537
    ZF ⊦ Σ4 0 determinateness
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4): 661-667. 1972.
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  46
    Measure and minimal degrees
    Annals of Mathematical Logic 11 (2): 203-216. 1977.
    Formal EpistemologyLogic and Philosophy of Logic
  •  211
    A Note on Binary Inductive Logic
    with C. J. Nix
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6): 735-771. 2007.
    We consider the problem of induction over languages containing binary relations and outline a way of interpreting and constructing a class of probability functions on the sentences of such a language. Some principles of inductive reasoning satisfied by these probability functions are discussed, leading in turn to a representation theorem for a more general class of probability functions satisfying these principles.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicInductive Logic
  •  189
    Some observations on induction in predicate probabilistic reasoning
    with M. J. Hill and G. M. Wilmers
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1): 43-75. 2002.
    We consider the desirability, or otherwise, of various forms of induction in the light of certain principles and inductive methods within predicate uncertain reasoning. Our general conclusion is that there remain conflicts within the area whose resolution will require a deeper understanding of the fundamental relationship between individuals and properties
    Prior ProbabilitiesIndifference PrinciplesEpistemic Logic
  •  1189
    Ancient Indian Logic and Analogy
    with A. Vencovska
    In S. Ghosh & S. Prasad (eds.), Logic and its Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10119, Springer. pp. 198-210. 2017.
    B.K.Matilal, and earlier J.F.Staal, have suggested a reading of the `Nyaya five limb schema' (also sometimes referred to as the Indian Schema or Hindu Syllogism) from Gotama's Nyaya-Sutra in terms of a binary occurrence relation. In this paper we provide a rational justification of a version of this reading as Analogical Reasoning within the framework of Polyadic Pure Inductive Logic.
    Probabilistic Principles, MiscPhilosophy of Probability, MiscSubjective Probability, MiscLogical Pro…Read more
    Probabilistic Principles, MiscPhilosophy of Probability, MiscSubjective Probability, MiscLogical Probability
  •  170
    Symmetry in Polyadic Inductive Logic
    with A. Vencovská
    Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (2): 189-216. 2012.
    A family of symmetries of polyadic inductive logic are described which in turn give rise to the purportedly rational Permutation Invariance Principle stating that a rational assignment of probabilities should respect these symmetries. An equivalent, and more practical, version of this principle is then derived
    Inductive LogicSubjective Probability, MiscProbabilistic Principles, MiscLogical Probability
  •  126
    A Note on Irrelevance in Inductive Logic
    with Alena Vencovská
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (3). 2011.
    We consider two formalizations of the notion of irrelevance as a rationality principle within the framework of (Carnapian) Inductive Logic: Johnson's Sufficientness Principle, JSP, which is classically important because it leads to Carnap's influential Continuum of Inductive Methods and the recently proposed Weak Irrelevance Principle, WIP. We give a complete characterization of the language invariant probability functions satisfying WIP which generalizes the Nix-Paris Continuum. We argue that t…Read more
    We consider two formalizations of the notion of irrelevance as a rationality principle within the framework of (Carnapian) Inductive Logic: Johnson's Sufficientness Principle, JSP, which is classically important because it leads to Carnap's influential Continuum of Inductive Methods and the recently proposed Weak Irrelevance Principle, WIP. We give a complete characterization of the language invariant probability functions satisfying WIP which generalizes the Nix-Paris Continuum. We argue that the derivation of two very disparate families of inductive methods from alternative perceptions of 'irrelevance' is an indication that this notion is imperfectly understood at present
    Inductive LogicProbabilistic Principles, MiscSubjective Probability, MiscLogical Probability
  •  81
    Initial Segments of Models of Peano's Axioms
    with L. A. S. Kirby, A. Lachlan, M. Srebrny, and A. Zarach
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (2): 482-483. 1983.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicModel Theory
  •  157
    The Type Theoretic Interpretation of Constructive Set Theory
    with Peter Aczel, Angus Macintyre, and Leszek Pacholski
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1): 313-314. 1984.
    Set TheoryType Theory in MathematicsIntuitionism and ConstructivismLogic and Philosophy of Logic
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback