• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

G. F. Schueler

University of Delaware
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    44
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    2
  •  News and Updates
    40

 More details
  • University of Delaware
    Department of Philosophy
    Retired faculty
University of California, Berkeley
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1973
APA Western Division
Email (login required)
Homepage
Newark, Delaware, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Mind
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Mind
Meta-Ethics
  • All publications (44)
  •  155
    Some reasoning about preferences
    Ethics 95 (1): 78-80. 1984.
    Value TheoryEthics
  •  2316
    Motivational Internalism and Externalism
    In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, Wiley-blackwell. pp. 293-300. 2010.
    This chapter contains sections titled: References.
    Internalism and Externalism about Moral Judgment
  •  1
    Exclusionary Reasons
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 60 (4): 407. 1979.
    Ethics
  •  198
    Review: Brute Rationality (review)
    Mind 115 (458): 412-415. 2006.
    Rationality
  •  237
    Why IS modesty a virtue?
    Ethics 109 (4): 835-841. 1999.
    Virtues and Vices
  •  198
    Reasons and purposes: human rationality and the teleological explanation of action
    Oxford University Press. 2003.
    People act for reasons. That is how we understand ourselves. But what is it to act for a reason? This is what Fred Schueler investigates. He rejects the dominant view that the beliefs and desires that constitute our reasons for acting simply cause us to act as we do, and argues instead for a view centred on practical deliberation--our ability to evaluate the reasons we accept. Schueler's account of 'reasons explanations' emphasizes the relation between reasons and purposes, and the fact that the…Read more
    People act for reasons. That is how we understand ourselves. But what is it to act for a reason? This is what Fred Schueler investigates. He rejects the dominant view that the beliefs and desires that constitute our reasons for acting simply cause us to act as we do, and argues instead for a view centred on practical deliberation--our ability to evaluate the reasons we accept. Schueler's account of 'reasons explanations' emphasizes the relation between reasons and purposes, and the fact that the reasons for an action are not always good reasons.
    Reasons and RationalityReasons and CausesCausal Theory of ActionAutonomy and Moral PsychologyAutonom…Read more
    Reasons and RationalityReasons and CausesCausal Theory of ActionAutonomy and Moral PsychologyAutonomy, Misc
  •  689
    Interpretative explanations
    In Constantine Sandis (ed.), New essays on the explanation of action, Palgrave-macmillan. 2009.
    Reasons and CausesIntentional ActionPsychological Explanation
  •  248
    Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action
    MIT Press. 1995.
    Does action always arise out of desire? G. F. Schueler examines this hotly debated topic in philosophy of action and moral philosophy, arguing that once two senses of "desire" are distinguished - roughly, genuine desires and pro attitudes - apparently plausible explanations of action in terms of the agent's desires can be seen to be mistaken. Desire probes a fundamental issue in philosophy of mind, the nature of desires and how, if at all, they motivate and justify our actions. At least since Hu…Read more
    Does action always arise out of desire? G. F. Schueler examines this hotly debated topic in philosophy of action and moral philosophy, arguing that once two senses of "desire" are distinguished - roughly, genuine desires and pro attitudes - apparently plausible explanations of action in terms of the agent's desires can be seen to be mistaken. Desire probes a fundamental issue in philosophy of mind, the nature of desires and how, if at all, they motivate and justify our actions. At least since Hume argued that reason "is and of right ought to be the slave of the passions," many philosophers have held that desires play an essential role both in practical reason and in the explanation of intentional action. G. F. Schueler looks at contemporary accounts of both roles in various belief-desire models of reasons and explanation and argues that the usual belief-desire accounts need to be replaced. Schueler contends that the plausibility of the standard belief-desire accounts rests largely on a failure to distinguish "desires proper," like a craving for sushi, from so-called "pro attitudes," which may take the form of beliefs and other cognitive states as well as desires proper. Schueler's "deliberative model" of practical reasoning suggests a different view of the place of desire in practical reason and the explanation of action. He holds that we can arrive at an intention to act by weighing the relevant considerations and that these may not include desires proper at all.
    Reasons and CausesMotivationExplanation of Action, MiscCausal Theory of ActionPractical Reason, Misc
  •  49
    Review of Joshua Gert: Normative Bedrock: Resopnse-Dependence, Rationality, and Reasons
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2013 (05.24). 2013.
  •  88
    The Evaluation of Teaching in Philosophy
    Teaching Philosophy 11 (4): 345-348. 1988.
    Philosophy of Education
  •  286
    Modus ponens and moral realism
    Ethics 98 (3): 492-500. 1988.
    Moral Realism, MiscLogic and Philosophy of LogicLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  40
    How Can Reason Be Practical?
    Critica 28 (84): 41-62. 1996.
    Value Theory, Miscellaneous
  •  110
    Akrasia revisited
    Mind 92 (368): 580-584. 1983.
    Motivation and Will
  •  227
    Why modesty is a virtue
    Ethics 107 (3): 467-485. 1997.
    Virtues and Vices
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback