• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Marcel Weber

University of Geneva
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    66
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    8
  •  News and Updates
    44

 More details
  • University of Geneva
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
Universität Konstanz
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1996
Homepage
Genève, GE, Switzerland
0000-0003-2142-5043
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Biology
General Philosophy of Science
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Mind
  • All publications (66)
  •  135
    Critical Notice: D arwinian Reductionism
    Biology and Philosophy 23 (1): 143-152. 2008.
    This notice provides a critical discussion of some of the issues from Alex Rosenberg’s Darwinian Reductionism, in particular proper functions and the relationship of proximate and ultimate biology, developmental programs and genocentrism, biological laws, the principle of natural selection as a fundamental law, genetic determinism, and the definition of “reductionism.”
    Reduction in BiologyEvolutionary Biology
  •  1201
    Philosophie der Lebenswissenschaften
    with Susanne Bauer, Lara Huber, Marie I. Kaiser, Lara Keuck, Ulrich Krohs, Maria Kronfeldner, Peter McLaughlin, Kären Nickelson, Thomas Reydon, Neil Roughley, Christian Sachse, Marianne Schark, Georg Toepfer, and Markus Wild
    Information Philosophie 4 14-27. 2013.
    This paper summarizes (in German) recent tendencies in the philosophy of the life sciences.
    Philosophy of Biology, General WorksReduction in Biology, MiscBiological Natural KindsRobustness in …Read more
    Philosophy of Biology, General WorksReduction in Biology, MiscBiological Natural KindsRobustness in Science
  •  173
    Experiment in Biology (2018 update)
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018.
    Experimentation in ScienceInference to the Best Explanation, MiscPhilosophy of Biology
  •  296
    The aim and structure of ecological theory
    Philosophy of Science 66 (1): 71-93. 1999.
    I present an attempt at an explication of the ecological theory of interspecific competition, including its explanatory role in community ecology and evolutionary biology. The account given is based on the idea that law-like statements play an important role in scientific theories of this kind. I suggest that the principle of competitive exclusion is such a law, and that it is evolutionarily invariant. The principle's empirical status is defended and implications for the ongoing debates on the e…Read more
    I present an attempt at an explication of the ecological theory of interspecific competition, including its explanatory role in community ecology and evolutionary biology. The account given is based on the idea that law-like statements play an important role in scientific theories of this kind. I suggest that the principle of competitive exclusion is such a law, and that it is evolutionarily invariant. The principle's empirical status is defended and implications for the ongoing debates on the existence of biological laws are discussed
    Ecology and Conservation Biology, MiscPopulation EcologySpecial Science LawsPragmatic Theories of Ex…Read more
    Ecology and Conservation Biology, MiscPopulation EcologySpecial Science LawsPragmatic Theories of ExplanationExplanation in BiologyCeteris Paribus Laws
  •  1206
    Indeterminism in neurobiology
    Philosophy of Science 72 (5): 663-674. 2005.
    I examine different arguments that could be used to establish indeterminism of neurological processes. Even though scenarios where single events at the molecular level make the difference in the outcome of such processes are realistic, this falls short of establishing indeterminism, because it is not clear that these molecular events are subject to quantum mechanical uncertainty. Furthermore, attempts to argue for indeterminism autonomously (i.e., independently of quantum mechanics) fail, becaus…Read more
    I examine different arguments that could be used to establish indeterminism of neurological processes. Even though scenarios where single events at the molecular level make the difference in the outcome of such processes are realistic, this falls short of establishing indeterminism, because it is not clear that these molecular events are subject to quantum mechanical uncertainty. Furthermore, attempts to argue for indeterminism autonomously (i.e., independently of quantum mechanics) fail, because both deterministic and indeterministic models can account for the empirically observed behavior of ion channels
    Philosophy of Neuroscience, MiscQuantum Determinism and Indeterminism
  •  91
    Evolutionary plasticity in prokaryotes: A panglossian view
    Biology and Philosophy 11 (1): 67-88. 1996.
    Enzyme directed genetic mechanisms causing random DNA sequence alterations are ubiquitous in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. A number of molecular geneticist have invoked adaptation through natural selection to account for this fact, however, alternative explanations have also flourished. The population geneticist G.C. Williams has dismissed the possibility of selection for mutator activity on a priori grounds. In this paper, I attempt a refutation of Williams' argument. In addition, I discuss …Read more
    Enzyme directed genetic mechanisms causing random DNA sequence alterations are ubiquitous in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. A number of molecular geneticist have invoked adaptation through natural selection to account for this fact, however, alternative explanations have also flourished. The population geneticist G.C. Williams has dismissed the possibility of selection for mutator activity on a priori grounds. In this paper, I attempt a refutation of Williams' argument. In addition, I discuss some conceptual problems related to recent claims made by microbiologists on the adaptiveness of molecular variety generators in the evolution of prokaryotes. A distinction is proposed between selection for mutations caused by a mutator activity and selection for the mutator activity proper. The latter requires a concept of fitness different from the one commonly used in microbiology.
    Mechanisms of EvolutionFitness
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback