•  27
    On Saying and Being
    Analysis 25 (Suppl-3). 1965.
  •  93
    Two Issues of Vagueness
    The Monist 81 (2): 193--214. 1998.
    Two issues of vagueness, which may together exhaust its philosophical interest, are, first, to solve the sorites paradox and, second, to explain the notion of a borderline case. I’ll try to make a little headway on both issues.
  •  321
    (1) The propositions we believe and say are _Russellian_ _propositions_: structured propositions whose basic components are the objects and properties our thoughts and speech acts are about. (2) Many singular terms
  • Meaning
    Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 163 478-479. 1973.
  •  20
    Overview of the Book
    Mind and Language 3 (1): 1-8. 1988.
  •  33
    Replies (review)
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1). 2006.
    There are important differences among those philosophers who would call themselves nominalists and thus claim to disbelieve in the existence of numbers, properties, propositions, and their ilk. Some are non-concessive, and would deny that sentences such as following can be true
  •  157
    Vague properties
    In Richard Dietz & Sebastiano Moruzzi (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, its Nature, and its Logic, Oxford University Press. pp. 109--130. 2010.
    I. Vague Properties and the Problem of Vagueness The philosophical problem of vagueness is to say what vagueness is in a way that helps to resolve the sorites paradox. Saying what vagueness is requires saying what kinds of things can be vague and in what the vagueness of each kind consists. Philosophers dispute whether things of this, that, or the other kind can be vague, but no one disputes that there are vague linguistic expressions. Among vague expressions, predicates hold a special place in …Read more
  •  12
    Correspondence & Disquotation (review)
    International Studies in Philosophy 28 (4): 112-113. 1996.
  •  84
    Pleonastic Fregeanism
    The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6 1-15. 2000.
    Fregeans hold that propositional attitudes are relations to structured propositions whose basic constituents are concepts, or modes of presentation, of the objects and properties our beliefs are about. It is widely thought that there are compelling objections to the Fregean theory of mental and linguistic content. However, as I try to show, these objections are met by the version of Frege’s theory which I call Pleonastic Fregeanism.
  •  128
  •  385
    Belief ascription
    Journal of Philosophy 89 (10): 499-521. 1992.