• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Attila Tanyi

Università degli Studi di Milano
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    63
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Recommended
    2
  •  Events
    2
  •  News and Updates
    56

 More details
  • Università degli Studi di Milano
    Department of Philosophy
    Associate Professor
Central European University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2006
Email (login required)
CV
Homepage
Milan, Italy
0000-0002-2027-9446
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Action
Applied Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
Social and Political Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Religion
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
Social and Political Philosophy
  • All publications (63)
  •  734
    On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity
    Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3): 248-251. 2015.
    In their article Yasha Rohwer and Emma Marris argue that there is no underived prima facie obligation to preserve genetic integrity. It is clearly demonstrated that conservation bi...
    NatureIntrinsic Environmental ValueEcology and Conservation Biology, MiscConservation Ethics
  •  706
    G. A. Cohen Why Not Socialism? című könyvéről (On G. A. Cohen’s Why Not Socialism?)
    In Balázs Böcskei & Miklós Sebők (eds.), Ötven könyv, amelyet minden baloldalinak ismernie kell (Fifty Books Everyone on the Left Should Know About), Kossuth. pp. 266-271. 2015.
    This is a short, critical introduction to Cohen's book and argument: that socialism is justified on several grounds contrary to common opinion. I present Cohen's arguments together with some potential problems as well as responses to them.
    Social and Political Philosophy, MiscNormative Ethics, MiscEquality, MiscMarketsPolitical Theory
  •  1080
    A Frankfurti Iskola és 1968 (The Frankfurt School and 1968)
    Fordulat 3 (2): 9-33. 2009.
    The aim of the paper is to investigate the connection between the Frankfurt School and the events of 1968. Accordingly, the paper focuses only on those important members of the School whose philosophical, ideological or practical influence on the events is clearly detectable. This means dealing with four thinkers in three sections: the influence of Adorno and Horkheimer is treated in the same section, whereas the work of Marcuse and Habermas is examined in separate sections. The three sections r…Read more
    The aim of the paper is to investigate the connection between the Frankfurt School and the events of 1968. Accordingly, the paper focuses only on those important members of the School whose philosophical, ideological or practical influence on the events is clearly detectable. This means dealing with four thinkers in three sections: the influence of Adorno and Horkheimer is treated in the same section, whereas the work of Marcuse and Habermas is examined in separate sections. The three sections represent three different approaches. Adorno and Horkheimer are passive onlookers of the events their passivity being rooted in their skeptical philosophical thinking. The initially also passive and pessimist Marcuse slowly rises to the role of the ’prophet’ of the students. And the early Habermas’ critical analysis paves the way for his initially pessimist, but later more optimistic reformist attitude. The paper is structured accordingly: after introductory thoughts, the mentioned thinkers are treated in separate sections that contain historo-philosophical analysis of their relevant works.
    Max HorkheimerJürgen HabermasCritical Theory, MiscWalter BenjaminTheodor W. Adorno
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback