-
454Answers to five questionsIn Jesús H. Aguilar & Andrei A. Buckareff (eds.), Philosophy of Action: 5 Questions, Automatic Press. 2009.Back when I was a college freshman, I started working as a research assistant to a young graduate student named Bertram Malle. I hadn’t actually known very much about Malle’s work when I first signed up for the position, but as luck would have it, he was a brilliant researcher with an innovative new approach. Malle was interested in understanding people’s ordinary intuitions about intentional action – the way in which people’s ascriptions of belief, desire, awareness and so forth ultimately feed…Read more
-
140Theory of mind and moral cognition: Exploring the connectionsTrends in Cognitive Science 9 (8): 357-359. 2005.An extremely brief (3 page) review of recent work on the ways in which people's moral judgments can influence their use of folk-psychological concepts
-
5340The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the selfPerspectives on Psychological Science. forthcoming.A long tradition of psychological research has explored the distinction between characteristics that are part of the self and those that lie outside of it. Recently, a surge of research has begun examining a further distinction. Even among characteristics that are internal to the self, people pick out a subset as belonging to the true self. These factors are judged as making people who they really are, deep down. In this paper, we introduce the concept of the true self and identify features…Read more
-
337ResponsibilityIn John M. Doris (ed.), Moral Psychology Handbook, Oxford University Press. 2010.A great deal of fascinating research has gone into an attempt to uncover the fundamental criteria that people use when assigning moral responsibility. Nonetheless, it seems that most existing accounts fall prey to one counterexample or another. The underlying problem, we suggest, is that there simply isn't any single system of criteria that people apply in all cases of responsibility attribution. Instead, it appears that people use quite different criteria in different kinds of cases. [This pape…Read more
-
1059Normality and actual causal strengthCognition 161 (C): 80-93. 2017.Existing research suggests that people's judgments of actual causation can be influenced by the degree to which they regard certain events as normal. We develop an explanation for this phenomenon that draws on standard tools from the literature on graphical causal models and, in particular, on the idea of probabilistic sampling. Using these tools, we propose a new measure of actual causal strength. This measure accurately captures three effects of normality on causal judgment that have been obse…Read more
-
135Is morality relative? Depends on your personalityThe Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52): 66-71. 2011.
-
181Folk judgments of causationStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2): 238-242. 2009.Experimental studies suggest that people’s ordinary causal judgments are affected not only by statistical considerations but also by moral considerations. One way to explain these results would be to construct a model according to which people are trying to make a purely statistical judgment but moral considerations somehow distort their intuitions. The present paper offers an alternative perspective. Specifically, the author proposes a model according to which the very same underlying mechanism…Read more
New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Metaphilosophy |
Philosophy of Cognitive Science |