• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Ronald Lindsay

Georgetown University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    35
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    5

 More details
Georgetown University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1996
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Religion
Applied Ethics
  • All publications (35)
  •  34
    Future bioethics: overcoming taboos, myths, and dogmas
    Prometheus Books. 2008.
    few areas of public policy have been fraught with as much controversy as bioethics. Each novel development in biomedical technology seems to spark rancorous disputes. Those averse to new technologies often express the concern that the new technology is 'unnatural' or requires us to 'play God'. Slogans such as 'Frankenfoods' and 'sanctity of life' substitute for reasoned argument. This is an ambitious book that seeks to reframe the debates surrounding current controversies in bioethics. Carefully…Read more
    few areas of public policy have been fraught with as much controversy as bioethics. Each novel development in biomedical technology seems to spark rancorous disputes. Those averse to new technologies often express the concern that the new technology is 'unnatural' or requires us to 'play God'. Slogans such as 'Frankenfoods' and 'sanctity of life' substitute for reasoned argument. This is an ambitious book that seeks to reframe the debates surrounding current controversies in bioethics. Carefully examining and dissecting claims made by many policy-makers and ethicists on topics such as assistance in dying, genetic engineering, and embryonic stem cell research, bioethicist Ronald A Lindsay shows that all too often these claims are based on instinctive reactions, beliefs that lack factual support, and religious or ideological dogma. After describing in detail the proper way to approach and resolve a dispute in bioethics, Lindsay proceeds to analyse several different cutting-edge issues. Through his insightful analysis, Lindsay demonstrates how to achieve pragmatic, progressive solutions to these controversies. An antidote for misguided thinking, "Future Bioethics" illuminates the way forward to bioethics policies appropriate for the 21st century.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  81
    The Need to Specify the Difference “Difference” Makes
    Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1): 34-37. 2002.
    Applied EthicsVarieties of FeminismHistory: Feminist Philosophy
  • Assisted Suicide: Will the Supreme Court Respect the Autonomy Rights of Dying Patients?
    Free Inquiry 17. 1996.
    Assisted SuicideAutonomy in Applied Ethics
  •  96
    Role-Differentiated Morality: The Need to Consider Institutions, Not Just Individuals
    American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4): 70-72. 2006.
    No abstract
    Biomedical EthicsMedical EthicsPublic Health
  •  97
    Why should we be concerned about disparate impact?
    American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5). 2006.
    This Article does not have an abstract
    Biomedical EthicsMedical Ethics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback