• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Leo Groarke

Trent University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    67
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    44

 More details
  • Trent University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
  • All publications (67)
  • The Sophists: Towards a More Sophisticated View
    Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 4
  •  37
    Commentary on Allan
  •  19
    Stewardship gone astray? Ethics and the SAA
    with Gary Warrick
    In Chris Scarre & Geoffrey Scarre (eds.), The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice, Cambridge University Press. pp. 163--180. 2006.
    Ethics
  •  4
    Paul Kurtz, The New Skepticism: Inquiry and Reliable Knowledge (review)
    Philosophy in Review 13 101-103. 1993.
    Varieties of Skepticism, MiscEpistemological Theories
  •  84
    Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument
    Argumentation 16 (3): 277-286. 2002.
    This paper responds to two aspects of Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). The first is his critique of deductivism. The second is his failure to make room for some species of argument (e.g., visual and kisceral arguments) proposed by recent commentators. In the first case, Johnson holds that argumentation theorists have adopted a notion of argument which is too narrow. In the second, that they have adopted one which is too broad. I discuss the case Johnson makes for both claims, and pos…Read more
    This paper responds to two aspects of Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). The first is his critique of deductivism. The second is his failure to make room for some species of argument (e.g., visual and kisceral arguments) proposed by recent commentators. In the first case, Johnson holds that argumentation theorists have adopted a notion of argument which is too narrow. In the second, that they have adopted one which is too broad. I discuss the case Johnson makes for both claims, and possible objections to his analysis
    Informal Logic
  •  168
    Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics
    Argumentation 13 (1): 1-16. 1999.
    The present paper elaborates a deductivist account of natural language argu-ment in the context of pragma-dialectics. It reviews earlier debates, criticizes some standard misconceptions in the literature, and argues that the identification and analysis of deductive argument schemes can be the basis of a compelling theory of argumentative discourse
    Informal LogicArgument
  •  139
    What's in a Number? Consequentialism and Employment Equity in Hall, Hurka, Sumner and Baker et al
    Dialogue 35 (2): 359-374. 1996.
    Affirmative Action
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback