-
14How to Kripke Brandom's Notion of NecessityIn Bernd Prien & David P. Schweikard (eds.), Robert Brandom: Analytic Pragmatist, Ontos. 2007.In this paper we discuss Brandom's definition of necessity, which is part of the incompatibility sematnics he develops in his fifth John Locke Lecture. By comparing incompatibility semantics to standard Kripkean possible worlds semantics for modality, we motivate an alternative definition of necessity in Brandom's own terms. Our investigation of this alternative necessity will show that - contra to Brandom's own results - incompatibility semantics does not necessarily lead to the notion of neces…Read more
-
78Another Reply to Raphael LatasterSophia 54 (1): 99-102. 2015.Lataster has published another reply to my article on panentheism and classical theism. I should like to respond, first, by way of pointing out some problems in Lataster’s understanding of my argument before; second, I show that Lataster’s panentheistic counterexamples to my distinction to distinguish between classical theism and panentheism presuppose the very distinction he seeks to refute
-
-
University of OxfordResearcher
Munich School of Philosophy
Alumnus, 2013
Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Areas of Specialization
| Metaphysics |
| Philosophy of Mind |
| Philosophy of Religion |
| 19th Century Philosophy |
| Metaphysics and Epistemology |