• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Cathy Costa

University of Notre Dame Australia
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    35
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • University of Notre Dame Australia
    School of Philosophy and Theology, Sydney
    Graduate student
  • All publications (35)
  •  129
    Seneca and the Greeks
    The Classical Review 39 (2): 237. 1989.
    ClassicsSeneca
  •  93
    Seneca's Agamemnon R. J. Tarrant: Seneca, Agamemnon. (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 18.) Pp. viii + 409. Cambridge: University Press, 1976. Cloth, £15 (review)
    The Classical Review 28 (2): 254-256. 1978.
    ClassicsSeneca
  •  37
    Review: Seneca IX: Tragedies II (review)
    The Classical Review 55 (2): 541-542. 2005.
    Seneca
  •  94
    AN ANTHOLOGY OF LETTERS M. B. Trapp (ed.): Greek and Latin Letters. An Anthology with Translation. (Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics.) Pp. xi + 348. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Cased, £47.50 (Paper, £17.99). ISBN: 0-521-49597-0 (0-521-49943-7 pbk) (review)
    The Classical Review 54 (2): 335. 2004.
    ClassicsAncient Greek and Roman Philosophy
  •  33
    Giving voice to values: An undergraduate nursing curriculum project
    with Sandra Lynch and Bethne L. Hart
    Among the competency standards stipulated by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council for graduating students are competencies in moral and ethical decision making and ethics education within professions such as nursing has traditionally focussed on these competencies, on raising ethical awareness and developing skills of analysis and reasoning. However, ethics education in tertiary settings places less emphasis on developing students’ capacities to act on their values. This paper explains a…Read more
    Among the competency standards stipulated by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council for graduating students are competencies in moral and ethical decision making and ethics education within professions such as nursing has traditionally focussed on these competencies, on raising ethical awareness and developing skills of analysis and reasoning. However, ethics education in tertiary settings places less emphasis on developing students’ capacities to act on their values. This paper explains and explores the adoption of Dr. Mary Gentile's curriculum (the Giving Voice to Values curriculum) which specifically focuses on developing students’ capacities to act on their values. The curriculum (Gentile, 2010) assists students and professionals to explore, script and rehearse responses which build upon their capacity to respond in accordance with their own values in complex workplace settings in which they face conflicts of value and belief. The paper firstly examines the theoretical underpinnings of the Giving Voice to Values (GVV) curriculum. It then presents the integration and evaluation phase of a Project inspired by the GVV methodology, using a case study approach within two areas of an undergraduate nursing curriculum. As a pilot project, this initiative has provided signposts to further curriculum development and to research pathways within the UNDA School of Nursing, by highlighting students’ uncertainties regarding their own professional values, and their intense struggles to voice their values within health care contexts
    EthicsPhilosophy of Teaching
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback