Carlos Thiebaut

Las polémicas en tomo a la querella «filosofía y literatura» refieren, ante todo, a problemas filosóficos y, en concreto, a tesis sobre la relación entre lenguaje y mundo. Las teorías desconstruccionistas practican un holismo trópico en el cual se comprende el holismo del significado desde una indiferenciación de funciones del lenguaje; por su parte, la teoría crítico-discursiva, aunque diferencia esas funciones y, sobre ellas, formas discursivas diversas, retiene la tesis del holismo del significado, en un modelo que se descubre como inestable por realizar una forma similar de proyección de la capacidad de abrir mundo de la función poética sobre todo el lenguaje. Desde esa perspectiva, la querella mencionada pasa de ser la de un conflicto entre retórica y filosofía a poder ser considerada como un momento de la poética y de la definición del canon.

With Arendt's insight regarding the need of judgment in the background, this paper pursues the ways in which the need for theory, or political philosophy, articulates Rawls' overall approach in order to tell just from unjust institutions. It suggests that the Kantian mould of reflective judgment gives form to the construction of a theory of justice via the mechanism of reflective equilibrium. The need for theory so devised has to constantly move between the demands of theory itself — the social contract tradition as understood by Rawls — and the demands of action understood as the guide that our considered judgments lend to our understanding of the social world. Finally, it is also suggested that a particular grasp of the lessons of historical experience, as a way of fulfilling the need for theory that lies in the heart of the exercise of judgment, is what renders the Rawlsian proposal theoretically attractive, and what constantly underlies the construction of his theory via the particular exemplification and the theoretical rendering of the moral semantics underlying democratic culture.