• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Graham White

Queen Mary University of London
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    48
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    41

 More details
  • Queen Mary University of London
    Regular Faculty
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Action
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Mind
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
  • All publications (48)
  •  20
    Luther on the Limits of Human Activity: Dinner-Parties and Suicide
    Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 26 54--70. 1984.
    Ethics20th Century German Philosophy
  •  63
    Essay Review of D.M. Gabbay and F. Guenther (eds), H andbook of Philosophical Logic , 2nd edn, vol 9, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer 2002 (review)
    History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2): 147--152. 2004.
    D. M. GABBAY and F. GUENTHER, Handbook of philosophical logic, 2nd edn, vol. 9. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 2002. xiv + 368 pp. €129.00, US$112.00, £79.00. ISBN1 402 00699 3. The philo...
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogicsNonclassical Logics
  • Category Theory and the Representation of Geometrical Information
    In F. D. Anger & R. V. Rodriguez (eds.), Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, Aaai. 1994.
    Category Theory
  • Balls and String
    String Theory
  •  153
    Simulation, Theory, and Cut Elimination
    The Monist 82 (1): 165-184. 1999.
    This paper is concerned. with the contrast between simulation- and deduction-based approaches to reasoning about physical objects. We show that linear logic can give a unified account of both simulation and deduction concerning physical objects; it also allows us to draw a principled distinction between simulation and deduction, since simulations correspond to cut-free proofs, whereas deductions correspond to proofs in general.
    Proof TheoryThe Simulation TheoryThe Theory TheoryThe Nature of Folk Psychology
  •  1
    Nicholas of Autrecourt
    In Thomas Mautner (ed.), The Penguin dictionary of philosophy, Penguin Books. 1997.
    13th/14th Century Philosophy
  • John Buridan
    In Thomas Mautner (ed.), The Penguin dictionary of philosophy, Penguin Books. 1997.
    Jean Buridan
  •  177
    Descartes Among the Robots: Computer Science and the Inner/outer Distinction
    Minds and Machines 21 (2): 179-202. 2011.
    We consider the symbol grounding problem, and apply to it philosophical arguments against Cartesianism developed by Sellars and McDowell: the problematic issue is the dichotomy between inside and outside which the definition of a physical symbol system presupposes. Surprisingly, one can question this dichotomy and still do symbolic computation: a detailed examination of the hardware and software of serial ports shows this
    Symbols and Symbol SystemsEpistemic Norms
  • Contexts for Human Action
    In Erol Gelenbe, Samson Abramsky & Vladimiro Sassone (eds.), Visions of Computer Science, British Computer Society. pp. 51--60. 2008.
  • Pelagianisms
    Viator 20 188--218. 1989.
  • A Linear Meta-Interpreter for the Situation Calculus
  • Lewis, Possible Worlds, and Non-Integrability
  •  60
    Heidegger (review)
    International Studies in Philosophy 22 (1): 103-104. 1990.
  • Davidson and Reiter: I. Equational Reasoning
  • Building Models of Prediction Theories
    with John Bell and Wilfrid Hodges
    Theories and Models
  •  45
    Theology and Logic: The Case of Ebeling
    Modern Theology 3 (1): 211--225. 1987.
    We examine Gerhard Ebeling's arguments against the use of logic in theology and find them unconvincing, mainly because Ebeling knows very little about logic as practiced.
  • Ockham and Wittgenstein
    In W. Vossenkuhl & R. Schönberger (eds.), Die Gegenwart Ockhams, Vch, Acta Humaniora. pp. 165--188. 1990.
    William of Ockham
  •  58
    Are We Finite?
    Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (3): 311--333. 1993.
    We argue that the unexpected examination paradox can be regarded as showing that the logic of temporally indexed epistemic states, although it is intuitively appealing, cannot be recursively axiomatised.
    Logical Consequence and EntailmentParadoxes, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback