• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Kirk Ludwig

Indiana University, Bloomington
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    154
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Recommended
    2
  •  Events
    12
  •  News and Updates
    71
  •  Philosophical Views

 More details
  • Indiana University, Bloomington
    Department of Philosophy
    Cognitive Science Program
    Professor
University of California, Berkeley
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1990
APA Central Division
Email (login required)
CV
Homepage
Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
0000-0002-9037-6292
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Mind
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Epistemology
Philosophy of Social Science
Metaphysics
Social and Political Philosophy
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Metaphilosophy
4 more
PhilPapers Editorships
Collective Intentionality
  • All publications (154)
  •  1026
    Is the aim of perception to provide accurate representations?
    In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, Wiley-blackwell. pp. 259-274. 2006.
    The paper rejects the claim that phenomena such as change and inattentional blindness show that perceptual representations are inaccurate or that a radical overhaul of our traditional picture of perception is required. The paper rejects in particular the sensorimotor theory of perception, which denies that there are any perceptual representations. It further argues that the degree of resolution of perceptual experience relevant to assessing its accuracy is determined by our use of it in standa…Read more
    The paper rejects the claim that phenomena such as change and inattentional blindness show that perceptual representations are inaccurate or that a radical overhaul of our traditional picture of perception is required. The paper rejects in particular the sensorimotor theory of perception, which denies that there are any perceptual representations. It further argues that the degree of resolution of perceptual experience relevant to assessing its accuracy is determined by our use of it in standard conditions, and that the integration of behavior with perceptual representation shows that it is by and large as accurate as its degree of resolution requires.
    The Contents of Perception, MiscThe Nature of Perceptual Experience, MiscPhilosophy of Perception, G…Read more
    The Contents of Perception, MiscThe Nature of Perceptual Experience, MiscPhilosophy of Perception, General
  •  1258
    The Reality of Language: on the Davidson-Dummett Debate
    with Ernest Lepore
    In R. E. Auxier & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Open Court. pp. 185-214. 2007.
    This chapter identifies the central issue between Michael Dummett and Donald Davidson on the role of convention in language and argues they are not as far apart in the end as they take themselves to be.
    Knowledge of LanguagePublic LanguageInterpretivist Accounts of Meaning and ContentDonald DavidsonMic…Read more
    Knowledge of LanguagePublic LanguageInterpretivist Accounts of Meaning and ContentDonald DavidsonMichael Dummett
  •  115
    Functionalism, causation and causal relevance
    PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 4. 1998.
    causal relevance, a three-place relation between event types, and circumstances, and argue for a logical independence condition on properties standing in the causal relevance relation relative to circumstances. In section 3, I apply these results to show that functionally defined states are not causally relevant to the output or state transitions in terms of which they are defined. In section 4, I extend this result to what that output in turn causes and to intervening mechanisms. In section 5, …Read more
    causal relevance, a three-place relation between event types, and circumstances, and argue for a logical independence condition on properties standing in the causal relevance relation relative to circumstances. In section 3, I apply these results to show that functionally defined states are not causally relevant to the output or state transitions in terms of which they are defined. In section 4, I extend this result to what that output in turn causes and to intervening mechanisms. In section 5, I examine the implications of this result for functional theories of mental states. In section 6, I distinguish between functional descriptions of properties and functional definitions of properties, and argue the former present no obstacle to mental states being causally relevant to behavior, but that this is so because they do not treat mental states as functional states. In section 7, I examine the nature of explanations that appeal to functional states or properties. section 8 identifies some difficulties that arise in thinking about specifically conscious mental states as functional states. section 9 is a brief conclusion.
    Functionalism, MiscFunctional ExplanationDispositions and Powers, MiscTheories of Causation, MiscMen…Read more
    Functionalism, MiscFunctional ExplanationDispositions and Powers, MiscTheories of Causation, MiscMental Causation, MiscFunctional Realization
  •  1001
    Is Distributed Cognition Group level Cognition?
    Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2): 189-224. 2015.
    This paper shows that recent arguments from group problem solving and task performance to emergent group level cognition that rest on the social parity and related principles are invalid or question begging. The paper shows that standard attributions of problem solving or task performance to groups require only multiple agents of the outcome, not a group agent over and above its members, whether or not any individual member of the group could have accomplished the task independently.
    Metaphysics of Mind, MiscCollective ActionCollective Mentality, MiscCollective Intentionality
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback