-
681How Pictorial is Chinese? And Does it Matter?Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 18 317-319. 2010.It has often been said that the Chinese script is pictorial or ideographic, and that this is one of the reasons why Chinese tend to think more analogically than logically, and why in the past the natural sciences developed to a lesser degree in China than in the West. These are strong claims. They have often been oversimplified and exaggerated, but I think there is something to be said for them. Here I will focus on the first question. I will argue that Chinese characters still have semantic fea…Read more
-
950Aesthetics and Rule FollowingContributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 24 260-262. 2016.In this essay I point out parallels between Kants theory of aesthetics and Wittgensteins discussion of rule following. Although Wittgenstein did not write an aesthetics and Kant did not discuss Wittgensteinian rule-following problems, and although both Kant and Wittgenstein begin at very different starting points and use different methods, they end up dealing with similar issues, namely issues about rules, particularity, exemplarity, objectivity, practice, and as-if statements.
-
128Jay Rosenberg: Thinking about knowing, OUP 2002 (review)European Journal of Philosophy 14 (3). 2006.
-
714Knowledge, Belief, and the A PrioriContributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11 369-370. 2003.This paper has two parts. In the first I give a brief historical account of the a priori and point out the central and problematic role of 'Erfahrung überhaupt' in Kant’s transcendental philosophy. In the second and main part I offer a criticism of Kripke’s arguments for the contingent a priori and I thereby question his radical separation of metaphysics and epistemology.
-
790Transcendental Philosophy and Mind-Body ReductionismContributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 16 390-392. 2008.The notion of “representation” is central to Kant’s transcendental philosophy. But naturalism and mind-body reductionism tend to reduce talk of (first-person) representation to stories of (third-person) causality and evolution. How does Kant fare in this context?
Areas of Specialization
1 more
| Philosophy of Mind |
| Aesthetics |
| Asian Philosophy |
| Free Will |
| Immanuel Kant |
| Ludwig Wittgenstein |