•  476
    Inexplicit information
    In Myles Brand (ed.), The Representation Of Knowledge And Belief, Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 1986.
    A discussion of a number of ways that information can be present in a computer program without being explicitly represented.
  •  153
    Conceptual role semantics and the explanatory role of content
    Philosophical Studies 65 (1-2): 103-127. 1992.
    I've tried to argue that there is more to representational content than CRS can acknowledge. CRS is attractive, I think, because of its rejection of atomism, and because it is a plausible theory of targets. But those are philosopher's concerns. Someone interested in building a person needs to understand representation, because, as AI researchers have urged for some time, good representation is the secret of good performance. I have just gestured in the direction I think a viable theory of repres…Read more
  •  19
    Berkeley
    Philosophical Review 88 (2): 299. 1979.
  •  31
    Biological preparedness and evolutionary explanation
    with Denise Dellarosa Cummins
    Cognition 73 (3). 1999.
    It is commonly supposed that evolutionary explanations of cognitive phenomena involve the assumption that the capacities to be explained are both innate and modular. This is understandable: independent selection of a trait requires that it be both heritable and largely decoupled from other ”nearby’ traits. Cognitive capacities realized as innate modules would certainly satisfy these contraints. A viable evolutionary cognitive psychology, however, requires neither extreme nativism nor modularity,…Read more
  •  75
    Radical connectionism
    with Georg Schwarz
    Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 26 (S1): 43-61. 1987.
  •  38
    Reply to Millikan
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1): 113-127. 2000.
  •  175
    It has been commonplace in epistemology since its inception to idealize away from computational resource constraints, i.e., from the constraints of time and memory. One thought is that a kind of ideal rationality can be specified that ignores the constraints imposed by limited time and memory, and that actual cognitive performance can be seen as an interaction between the norms of ideal rationality and the practicalities of time and memory limitations. But a cornerstone of naturalistic epistemol…Read more
  •  253
    Biological preparedness and evolutionary explanation
    with Denise D. Cummins
    Cognition 73 (3). 1999.
    It is commonly supposed that evolutionary explanations of cognitive phenomena involve the assumption that the capacities to be explained are both innate and modular. This is understandable: independent selection of a trait requires that it be both heritable and largely decoupled from other `nearby' traits. Cognitive capacities realized as innate modules would certainly satisfy these contraints. A viable evolutionary cognitive psychology, however, requires neither extreme nativism nor modularity,…Read more
  •  51
    The World in the Head
    Oxford University Press. 2010.
    Robert Cummins presents a series of essays motivated by the following question: Is the mind a collection of beliefs and desires that respond to and condition our feeling and perceptual experiences, or is this just a natural way to talk about it? What sort of conceptual framework do we need to understand what is really going on in our brains?
  •  71
  • The Mind of the Matter: Comments on Paul Churchland
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984 791-798. 1984.
  •  305
    Programs in the explanation of behavior
    Philosophy of Science 44 (June): 269-87. 1977.
    The purpose of this paper is to set forth a sense in which programs can and do explain behavior, and to distinguish from this a number of senses in which they do not. Once we are tolerably clear concerning the sort of explanatory strategy being employed, two rather interesting facts emerge; (1) though it is true that programs are "internally represented," this fact has no explanatory interest beyond the mere fact that the program is executed; (2) programs which are couched in information process…Read more
  •  1
  •  84
    Intention, meaning and truth-conditions
    Philosophical Studies 35 (4). 1979.
    In this paper, I sketch a revision of jonathan bennett's "meaning-Nominalist strategy" for explaining the conventional meanings of utterance-Types. Bennett's strategy does not explain sentence-Meaning by appeal to sub-Sentential meanings, And hence cannot hope to yield a theory that assigns a meaning to every sentence. I revise the strategy to make it applicable to predication and identification. The meaning-Convention for a term can then be used to fix its satisfaction conditions. Adapting a fa…Read more
  •  14
    Computation and Cognition (review)
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (1): 147-162. 1988.
  •  175
    The missing shade of blue
    Philosophical Review 87 (October): 548-565. 1978.
  •  100
    Two tales of functional explanation
    Philosophical Psychology 27 (6): 773-788. 2014.
    This paper considers two ways functions figure into scientific explanations: (i) via laws?events are causally explained by subsuming those events under functional laws; and (ii) via designs?capacities are explained by specifying the functional design of a system. We argue that a proper understanding of how functions figure into design explanations of capacities makes it clear why such functions are ill-suited to figure into functional-cum-causal law explanations of events, as those explanations …Read more
  •  282
    Reflection on Reflective Equilibrium
    In Michael Raymond DePaul & William M. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 113-128. 1998.
    As a procedure, reflective equilibrium is simply a familiar kind of standard scientific method with a new name. A theory is constructed to account for a set of observations. Recalcitrant data may be rejected as noise or explained away as the effects of interference of some sort. Recalcitrant data that cannot be plausibly dismissed force emendations in theory. What counts as a plausible dismissal depends, among other things, on the going theory, as well as on background theory and on knowledge th…Read more
  • Comments on Smith on Cummins
    In Hugh Clapin (ed.), Philosophy of Mental Representation, Oxford University Press Uk. 2002.
  •  56
    Form, interpretation, and the uniqueness of content: A response to Morris (review)
    Minds and Machines 1 (1): 31-42. 1991.
    In response to Michael Morris, I attempt to refute the crucial second premise of the argument, which states that the formality condition cannot be satisfied “non-stipulatively” in computational systems. I defend the view of representation urged in Meaning and Mental Representation against the charge that it makes content stipulative and therefore irrelevant to the explanation of cognition. Some other reservations are expressed