profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Claude Gratton

University of Toronto, St. George Campus
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    38
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    31

 More details
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Graduate Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1995
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Applied Ethics
Normative Ethics
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
20th Century Philosophy
General Philosophy of Science
2 more
  • All publications (38)
  •  280
    What is an Infinite Regress Argument?
    Informal Logic 18 (2). 1996.
    I describe the general structure of most infinite regress arguments; introduce some basic vocabulary; present a working hypothesis of the nature and derivation of an infinite regress; apply this working hypothesis to various infinite regress arguments to explain why they fail to entail an infinite regress; describe a common mistake in attempting to derive certain infinite regresses; and examine how infinite regresses function as a premise
    Informal Logic
  •  62
    Arguments about Arguments (review)
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (1-2): 49-51. 2004.
    Informal Logic
  •  139
    Perelman`s Rhetorique
    Informal Logic 12 (2). 1990.
    Informal Logic
  •  79
    Jacques Pierre, Mircea Eliade : le jour et la nuit. Entre la littérature et la science, Montréal, Hurtubise HMH , 1989, 376 pages (review)
    Philosophiques 20 (1): 205-206. 1993.
  •  74
    Common pedagogical weaknesses in critical thinking textbooks and courses
    Informal Logic
  •  86
    Counterexamples and Tacit Premises
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (1): 9-22. 2000.
    I argue that there are at least two kinds of tacit premises; describe a certain type of counterexample against the validity of arguments, and then use it to identify one kind of tacit premise. I distinguish two classes of tacit premises on the grounds that they are discovered or constructed differently, they have different roles in an argument or causal explanation, and have different logical relations to each other.
    Tacit and Dispositional Belief
  •  35
    The Overall Evaluation of Arguments: How Probable/Acceptable is a Conclusion Given the Evaluation of the Truth and Support of its Reasons?
    : I explore the logic of counterexamples by possible conjunction in order to extend their use to estimate the degree of support of premises; address some problems with my proposal; discuss some ways of teaching this extended use; and argue that conditional probability fails to express the degree of support of premises. The scant literature on this topic sometimes presents the degree of support of premises P1…Pn for conclusion C in terms of conditional probability, Pr. I will argue that the degre…Read more
    : I explore the logic of counterexamples by possible conjunction in order to extend their use to estimate the degree of support of premises; address some problems with my proposal; discuss some ways of teaching this extended use; and argue that conditional probability fails to express the degree of support of premises. The scant literature on this topic sometimes presents the degree of support of premises P1…Pn for conclusion C in terms of conditional probability, Pr. I will argue that the degree of support is better expressed by the probability of the conditional statement expressing the inference, Pr; and prove that Pr is not equivalent to Pr.
    Informal Logic
  • Louis Althusser, Sur la philosophie (review)
    Philosophy in Review 15 1-1. 1995.
    20th Century Continental PhilosophyLouis Althusser
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University