-
286What is an Infinite Regress Argument?Informal Logic 18 (2). 1996.I describe the general structure of most infinite regress arguments; introduce some basic vocabulary; present a working hypothesis of the nature and derivation of an infinite regress; apply this working hypothesis to various infinite regress arguments to explain why they fail to entail an infinite regress; describe a common mistake in attempting to derive certain infinite regresses; and examine how infinite regresses function as a premise
-
64Arguments about Arguments (review)Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (1-2): 49-51. 2004.
-
82Jacques Pierre, Mircea Eliade : le jour et la nuit. Entre la littérature et la science, Montréal, Hurtubise HMH , 1989, 376 pages (review)Philosophiques 20 (1): 205-206. 1993.
-
91Counterexamples and Tacit PremisesInquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (1): 9-22. 2000.I argue that there are at least two kinds of tacit premises; describe a certain type of counterexample against the validity of arguments, and then use it to identify one kind of tacit premise. I distinguish two classes of tacit premises on the grounds that they are discovered or constructed differently, they have different roles in an argument or causal explanation, and have different logical relations to each other.