• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Claude Gratton

University of Toronto, St. George Campus
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    38
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    31

 More details
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Graduate Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1995
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Applied Ethics
Normative Ethics
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
20th Century Philosophy
General Philosophy of Science
2 more
  • All publications (38)
  •  40
    From The Editor
    Informal Logic 20 (3). 2000.
    Informal Logic
  •  58
    Commentary on Alvarez
    Varieties of CausationMotivation and Will
  •  286
    What is an Infinite Regress Argument?
    Informal Logic 18 (2). 1996.
    I describe the general structure of most infinite regress arguments; introduce some basic vocabulary; present a working hypothesis of the nature and derivation of an infinite regress; apply this working hypothesis to various infinite regress arguments to explain why they fail to entail an infinite regress; describe a common mistake in attempting to derive certain infinite regresses; and examine how infinite regresses function as a premise
    Informal Logic
  •  64
    Arguments about Arguments (review)
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (1-2): 49-51. 2004.
    Informal Logic
  •  143
    Perelman`s Rhetorique
    Informal Logic 12 (2). 1990.
    Informal Logic
  •  82
    Jacques Pierre, Mircea Eliade : le jour et la nuit. Entre la littérature et la science, Montréal, Hurtubise HMH , 1989, 376 pages (review)
    Philosophiques 20 (1): 205-206. 1993.
  •  75
    Common pedagogical weaknesses in critical thinking textbooks and courses
    Informal Logic
  •  91
    Counterexamples and Tacit Premises
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (1): 9-22. 2000.
    I argue that there are at least two kinds of tacit premises; describe a certain type of counterexample against the validity of arguments, and then use it to identify one kind of tacit premise. I distinguish two classes of tacit premises on the grounds that they are discovered or constructed differently, they have different roles in an argument or causal explanation, and have different logical relations to each other.
    Tacit and Dispositional Belief
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback