• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Lily Frank

Eindhoven University of Technology
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    38
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    22

 More details
  • Eindhoven University of Technology
    Department of Philosophy and Ethics
    Assistant Professor
The Graduate Center, CUNY
PhD, 2014
Email (login required)
Homepage
0000-0001-8659-2390
Areas of Specialization
Biomedical Ethics
Applied Ethics
Normative Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Robot Ethics
Engineering Ethics
1 more
Areas of Interest
Applied Ethics
Moral Realism
Moral Cognitivism
Amoralists
Biomedical Ethics
Reproductive Ethics
Neuroethics
Medical Ethics
Drugs
Technology Ethics
Engineering Ethics
Robot Ethics
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
Moral Status of Artificial Systems
9 more
  • All publications (38)
  •  996
    Swiping Left on the Quantified Relationship: Exploring the Potential Soft Impacts
    with Michał Klincewicz
    American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2): 27-28. 2018.
    Biomedical EthicsTechnology Ethics
  •  486
    Robot sex and consent: Is consent to sex between a robot and a human conceivable, possible, and desirable?
    with Sven Nyholm
    Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3): 305-323. 2017.
    The development of highly humanoid sex robots is on the technological horizon. If sex robots are integrated into the legal community as “electronic persons”, the issue of sexual consent arises, which is essential for legally and morally permissible sexual relations between human persons. This paper explores whether it is conceivable, possible, and desirable that humanoid robots should be designed such that they are capable of consenting to sex. We consider reasons for giving both “no” and “yes” …Read more
    The development of highly humanoid sex robots is on the technological horizon. If sex robots are integrated into the legal community as “electronic persons”, the issue of sexual consent arises, which is essential for legally and morally permissible sexual relations between human persons. This paper explores whether it is conceivable, possible, and desirable that humanoid robots should be designed such that they are capable of consenting to sex. We consider reasons for giving both “no” and “yes” answers to these three questions by examining the concept of consent in general, as well as critiques of its adequacy in the domain of sexual ethics; the relationship between consent and free will; and the relationship between consent and consciousness. Additionally we canvass the most influential existing literature on the ethics of sex with robots.
    Robot EthicsSexual EthicsRobotics
  •  52
    The Human Microbiome
    with Keith Benkov, Martin Blaser, Matthew E. Rhodes, and Rhoda Sperling
    In Rosamond Rhodes, Nada Gligorov & Abraham Paul Schwab (eds.), the human microbiome: ethical, legal and social concerns, Oxford University Press. 2013.
  •  30
    From Sex Robots to Love Robots: Is Mutual Love with a Robot Possible?
    with Sven Nyholm
    In John Danaher & Neil McArthur (eds.), Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications, Mit Press. pp. 219-244. 2017.
    Some critics of sex-robots worry that their use might spread objectifying attitudes about sex, and common sense places a higher value on sex within love-relationships than on casual sex. If there could be mutual love between humans and sex-robots, this could help to ease the worries about objectifying attitudes. And mutual love between humans and sex-robots, if possible, could also help to make this sex more valuable. But is mutual love between humans and robots possible, or even conceivable? We…Read more
    Some critics of sex-robots worry that their use might spread objectifying attitudes about sex, and common sense places a higher value on sex within love-relationships than on casual sex. If there could be mutual love between humans and sex-robots, this could help to ease the worries about objectifying attitudes. And mutual love between humans and sex-robots, if possible, could also help to make this sex more valuable. But is mutual love between humans and robots possible, or even conceivable? We discuss three clusters of ideas and associations commonly discussed within the philosophy of love, and relate these to the topic of whether mutual love could be achieved between humans and sex-robots: (i) the idea of love as a “good match”; (ii) the idea of valuing each other in our distinctive particularity; and (iii) the idea of a steadfast commitment. We consider relations among these ideas and the sort of agency and free will that we attribute to human romantic partners. Our conclusion is that mutual love between humans and advanced sex-robots is not an altogether impossible proposition. However, it is unlikely that we will be able to create robots sophisticated enough to be able to participate in love-relationships anytime soon.
    Robot EthicsEthics of LoveDefining LoveRobotics
  •  104
    Improving third-year medical students' competency in clinical moral reasoning: Two interventions
    with Paul J. Cummins, Katherine J. Mendis, Robert Fallar, Amanda Favia, Carolyn Plunkett, Nada Gligorov, and Rosamond Rhodes
    AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (3): 140-148. 2016.
    Ethics
  •  11
    Privacy, Confidentiality, and New Ways of Knowing More in The Human Microbiome: Ethical, Legal, and Social Concerns
    with Nada Gligorov, Abraham Schwab, and Brett Trusko
    In Rosamond Rhodes, Nada Gligorov & Abraham Paul Schwab (eds.), the human microbiome: ethical, legal and social concerns, Oxford University Press. 2013.
  •  126
    Person-Centered Care, Autonomy, and the Definition of Health
    American Journal of Bioethics 13 (8): 59-61. 2013.
    No abstract
    Biomedical EthicsAutonomy in Applied Ethics
  •  167
    Saying Privacy, Meaning Confidentiality
    with Abraham P. Schwab and Nada Gligorov
    American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11): 44-45. 2011.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 11, Page 44-45, November 2011
    Biomedical EthicsConfidentiality in Medicine
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback