• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Steven Merle Duncan

Bellevue Community College
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    47
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    47

 More details
  • Bellevue Community College
    Department of Philosophy
    Retired faculty
University of Washington
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1987
Email (login required)
Homepage
Bellevue, Washington, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology
Philosophy of Religion
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
History of Western Philosophy
  • All publications (47)
  •  1068
    Mind, Body, Space, and Time
    In this essay I explore some of the basic elements of consciousness from a substance dualist point of view, incorporating some elements of Kant's Transcendental Analytic into an overall account of the constitution of consciousness.
    Knowledge of ConsciousnessEpistemology of Mind, MiscFirst-Person Approaches in the Science of Consci…Read more
    Knowledge of ConsciousnessEpistemology of Mind, MiscFirst-Person Approaches in the Science of ConsciousnessKant: TimeKant: Philosophy of Mind
  •  1199
    God is NOT Hidden
    In this paper I argue that there is no problem of Divine Hiddenness for Christians and offer an alternate explanation for the widespread claim that God's existence is hidden based on the Christian doctrine of Original Sin.
    Arguments Against Theism, MiscDivine Hiddenness
  •  1554
    Dualism and Neuroscience
    In this paper, I offer a new account of mind/body interaction that shows how it is possible for an immaterial mind or soul to influence a physical system without entering the horizontal system of efficient causes studied by natural science.
    Philosophy of Neuroscience, Misc
  •  1073
    The Burning Bush
    In this paper, I present some ruminations on Hume's argument from miracles and the distorted view of rationality that it reflects (along with religious skepticism generally) contrasting it with what I take to be a better account of rationality, one more sympathetic - at least less hostile - to religious claims.
    Epistemology of Religion, MiscReligious Skepticism
  •  952
    Possibilities that Matter I: Material Possibility
    This is the first of a series of four papers presenting modal logic as a branch of material, rather than merely formal, logic.
    Intensional Modal Logic
  •  562
    Kant and Theoretical Inquiry
    This essay discusses recent attempts to show that Kant's philosophy is coherent and consistent on its own terms. This paper was read at the annual POH Symposium in Lake Wenatchee, WA in May, 2013.
    Kant: Transcendental Idealism
  •  809
    Causal Necessity and the Future: Two Views
    In this paper I offer an alternative to the standard, mechanistic/fatalistic account of causal necessity, one compatible with the existence of laws of nature but not deterministic in the way this is usually understood.
    Causation and Laws of NatureModality and Laws of Nature
  •  1174
    Platonism by the Numbers
    In this paper, I defend traditional Platonic mathematical realism from its contemporary detractors, arguing that numbers, understood as abstract, non-physical objects of rational intuition, are indispensable for the act of counting.
    Mathematical Truth, MiscMathematical Platonism
  •  1059
    Could Introspection be Unreliable - even in Principle?
    I argue that, despite claims that might be made to the contrary, no scientific evidence could ever prove that introspection is unreliable, even in principle. This paper was read at the annual POH symposium in Lake Wenatchee in May, 2011.
    Epistemology, Misc
  •  952
    Sin and Suffering
    In this essay I discuss the concept of suffering, the causes of suffering, and the Christian solution to the problem of suffering. I conclude that there is no basis, within the Christian view of things, for raising the traditional problem of evil through reflection on the fact of substantial suffering in the world. I thus respectfully suggest that the problem of evil is only a problem for non-believers, who have the wrong perspective on the nature and source of suffering. (When first uploaded to…Read more
    In this essay I discuss the concept of suffering, the causes of suffering, and the Christian solution to the problem of suffering. I conclude that there is no basis, within the Christian view of things, for raising the traditional problem of evil through reflection on the fact of substantial suffering in the world. I thus respectfully suggest that the problem of evil is only a problem for non-believers, who have the wrong perspective on the nature and source of suffering. (When first uploaded to this website, the text of this essay was inadvertently replaced by that for a different essay, "Morality and Fallen Man." That essay has been uploaded and the original text restored.)
    Christianity, MiscThe Argument from Evil
  •  679
    Negative Emotions
    I have a theory of the emotions that many people find unflattering. I contend that all emotions, as such, are negative and neither life-enhancing nor truth-connected. In this essay, I present this theory and my reasons for it.
    Cognitive Theories of Emotions
  •  1687
    Happiness: A Preliminary Investigation
    Philosophy, Miscellaneous
  •  1770
    Descartes' Refutation of Atheism: A Defense
    Descartes argues that, apart from the existence of a veracious God, we can have no reason to believe that we possess reliable cognitive faculties, with the result that, if atheism is true, not even our seemingly most certain beliefs can count as knowledge for us. Since the atheist denies the existence of God, he or she will be precisely in this position. I argue that Descartes' argument is sound, and that atheism is therefore self-refuting.
    René DescartesAtheism
  •  1305
    The Inescapable Self
    In this paper I discuss the existence of the substantial self and argue against those, like Hume, who deny its reality.
    The SoulIntrospection and IntrospectionismObservation-Based Accounts of Self-Knowledge
  •  887
    Possibilities that Matter II: Material Contingency and Sufficient Reason
    This is the second of a series of papers inspired by a paper I wrote around 1989. In this paper, I consider the notion of material contingency and relate it to the traditional, metaphysically loaded Principle of Sufficient Reason.
    Intensional Modal Logic
  •  2133
    Kant's Critique of the Ontological Argument: FAIL
    In this paper, I argue that Kant's famous critique of the Ontological Argument largely begs the question against that argument, and is no better when supplemented by the modern quantificational analysis of "exists." In particular, I argue that the claim, common to Hume and Kant, that conceptual truths can never entail substantive existential claims is false,and thus no ground for rejecting the Ontological Argument.
    Descartes' Ontological ArgumentKant: Social, Political and Religious Thought, MiscKant: Rational The…Read more
    Descartes' Ontological ArgumentKant: Social, Political and Religious Thought, MiscKant: Rational Theology
  •  980
    Could Sensation be a Bodily Act?
    Hylomorphists claim that sensation is a bodily act. In this essay, I attempt to make sense of this notion but conclude that sensation is not a bodily act, but a mental one occurring in an intentional field of awareness.
    Philosophical Traditions, MiscThe Objects of PerceptionSensation and PerceptionBodily Sensations
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback