•  901
    How to interpret collective aggregated judgments?
    Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (11): 26-27. 2013.
    Our digital society increasingly relies in the power of others’ aggregated judgments to make decisions. Questions as diverse as which film we will watch, what scientific news we will decide to read, which path we will follow to find a place, or what political candidate we will vote for are usually associated to a rating that influences our final decisions.
  •  115
    Erratic Being (Luis Sáez Rueda) (review)
    Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1): 149-151. 2013.
    In the work Ser errático (Erratic Being) Luis Sáez Rueda proposes a Critical ontology of society in which the author analyses some of the most salient philosophical questions relating to different philosophical traditions, especially to phenomenology, in which he is a specialist. However, it must be said that the essay Erratic Being stands out as a clear exercise in philosophical and literary creativity. Ser errático is an essay arranged in four chapters: Phenomenology of everyday life; Erratic …Read more