• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Thomas E. Wartenberg

Mount Holyoke College
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    137
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    6
  •  News and Updates
    17

 More details
  • Mount Holyoke College
    Department of Philosophy
    Retired faculty
University of Pittsburgh
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1978
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Aesthetics
Areas of Interest
Aesthetics
  • All publications (137)
  •  134
    Philosophy & Film
    Philosophy Now 58 46-47. 2006.
    Film Media
  •  45
    Blending Fiction and Reality
    In No&#235l Carroll & Lester H. Hunt (eds.), Philosophy in The Twilight Zone, Wiley-blackwell. 2009.
    This chapter contains sections titled: 1 2 3 4 Acknowledgment Notes.
  •  18
    Not Just Mere Things
    Contemporary Aesthetics 6. 2008.
  •  46
    What Else Films Can Do: A Response to Bruce Russell
    Film and Philosophy 27-34. 2008.
    Philosophy Through Film
  • Heidegger
    In Berys Gaut & Dominic Lopes (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, Routledge. 2013.
    Aesthetics
  •  200
    The Forms of Power
    Analyse & Kritik 10 (1): 3-31. 1988.
    The question of how to define the concept of social power has been a focus of controversy among social theorists. In this paper, I put forward a definition of social power that avoids many of the pitfalls of previous attempts at such a definition. Roughly, I define the power which one agent has over another as the ability that the dominant agent has to control the situation within which the subservient agent acts. Using this basic definition of power, I go on to define many of the central forms …Read more
    The question of how to define the concept of social power has been a focus of controversy among social theorists. In this paper, I put forward a definition of social power that avoids many of the pitfalls of previous attempts at such a definition. Roughly, I define the power which one agent has over another as the ability that the dominant agent has to control the situation within which the subservient agent acts. Using this basic definition of power, I go on to define many of the central forms in which power actually exists, forms that are conceptualized by such concepts as force, coercion, and influence. I show that these different forms of power can all be understood as specifications of the generic definition of power that I offered and go on to develop an account of how they function in relation to one another in actual relationship of social power.
    Michel Foucault
  •  31
    Film and Representation
    In Ananta Charana Sukla (ed.), Art and Representation: Contributions to Contemporary Aesthetics, Praeger. pp. 210. 2000.
  •  203
    “Species-being” and “human nature” in Marx
    Human Studies 5 (1). 1982.
    Karl MarxHuman Nature
  •  113
    Philosophy of film
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008.
    Cinema
  •  31
    Comment
    Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America 7 213-218. 1984.
  •  22
    Philosophy & Film
    Philosophy Now 48 46-47. 2004.
    Film Media
  •  74
    "But would you want your daughter to marry one?" The representation of race and racism in guess who's coming to dinner
    Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (s1): 99-130. 1994.
    Racism
  • Marx and the Social Constitution of Value in Essays on Marx: Value, Property and Ideology
    Philosophical Forum 16 (4). 1985.
  •  181
    The Situated Conception of Social Power
    Social Theory and Practice 14 (3): 317-343. 1988.
    Value TheorySocial and Political Philosophy
  •  79
    Film Column
    Philosophy Now 33 50-51. 2001.
    Film Media
  •  39
    The Counterfeiters (review)
    Philosophy Now 68 38-39. 2008.
  •  78
    Can romance function as social criticism? A defense of unlikely couples
    Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (2). 2002.
    Philosophy of Film, MiscCinemaSocial and Political PhilosophyPhilosophy of Sexuality
  • Reason and Truth in Kant's Theory of Experience
    Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. 1977.
  •  57
    Philosophy & Film
    Philosophy Now 48 46-47. 2004.
    Film Media
  •  3
    Big Ideas for Little Kids: Teaching Philosophy Through Children's Literature, 2nd edition
    R&L Education. 2014.
    Big Ideas for Little Kids includes everything a teacher, a parent, or a college student needs to teach philosophy to elementary school children from picture books. Written in a clear and accessible style, the book explains why it is important to allow young children access to philosophy during primary-school education. Wartenberg also gives advice on how to construct a "learner-centered" classroom, in which children discuss philosophical issues with one another as they respond to open-ended ques…Read more
    Big Ideas for Little Kids includes everything a teacher, a parent, or a college student needs to teach philosophy to elementary school children from picture books. Written in a clear and accessible style, the book explains why it is important to allow young children access to philosophy during primary-school education. Wartenberg also gives advice on how to construct a "learner-centered" classroom, in which children discuss philosophical issues with one another as they respond to open-ended questions by saying whether they agree or disagree with what others have said.
    Philosophy in SchoolsPhilosophy for Children: Educational Theory and MethodsPhilosophy for Children:…Read more
    Philosophy in SchoolsPhilosophy for Children: Educational Theory and MethodsPhilosophy for Children: Introductions
  •  172
    Need there be implicit narrators of literary fictions?
    Philosophical Studies 135 (1). 2007.
    Fictional CharactersNarrativeNarration in Film
  • W Marx's Hegel's Phanomenologie Des Geistes (review)
    Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 9 18-21. 1984.
    G. W. F. Hegel
  •  107
    Quine and the third manual
    with David J. Ross
    Metaphilosophy 14 (3-4): 267-275. 1983.
    Philosophy of Language, General WorksW. V. O. Quine
  •  4
    Hegel's idealism: The logic of conceptuality'
    In Frederick C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge University Press. pp. 102--29. 1993.
    German Idealism
  •  146
    The nature of art: an anthology (edited book)
    Harcourt College. 2002.
    THE NATURE OF ART is a collection of 29 seminal, historically-organized readings that are focused on a basic philosophical question: What is Art? Including writings from the Western tradition'both Continental and Analytic traditions'as well as non-Western, minority, and feminist writings, this volume provides students with a rich set of resources to explore this matter both broadly and deeply. Introductions to each reading situate the selection amidst each respective thinker's body of work and t…Read more
    THE NATURE OF ART is a collection of 29 seminal, historically-organized readings that are focused on a basic philosophical question: What is Art? Including writings from the Western tradition'both Continental and Analytic traditions'as well as non-Western, minority, and feminist writings, this volume provides students with a rich set of resources to explore this matter both broadly and deeply. Introductions to each reading situate the selection amidst each respective thinker's body of work and the greater philosophical context in which the remarks arose. Reading questions accompany each selection, drawing students' attention to key points to be encountered. Hailed by reviewers and adopters for its clarity and rigor, Wartenberg's THE NATURE OF ART offers a lively and engaging introduction to the philosophy of art.
    AestheticsPoetry
  •  6
    Fight Club (edited book)
    Routledge. 2013.
    Released in 1999, _Fight Club_ is David Fincher’s popular adaption of Chuck Palahniuk’s cult novel, and one of the most philosophically rich films of recent years. This is the first book to explore the varied philosophical aspects of the film. Beginning with an introduction by the editor that places the film and essays in context, each chapter explores a central theme of _Fight Club_ from a philosophical perspective. Topics discussed include: _Fight Club_, Plato’s cave and Descartes’ cogito mora…Read more
    Released in 1999, _Fight Club_ is David Fincher’s popular adaption of Chuck Palahniuk’s cult novel, and one of the most philosophically rich films of recent years. This is the first book to explore the varied philosophical aspects of the film. Beginning with an introduction by the editor that places the film and essays in context, each chapter explores a central theme of _Fight Club_ from a philosophical perspective. Topics discussed include: _Fight Club_, Plato’s cave and Descartes’ cogito moral disintegration identity, gender and masculinity visuals and narration. Including annotated further reading at the end of each chapter, _Fight Club_ is essential reading for anyone interested in the film, as well as those studying philosophy and film studies.
  •  104
    Style and Methodologies, on Noel Carroll's Engaging the Moving Image
    Film-Philosophy 9 (4). 2005.
    Philosophy of Film
  •  140
    Philosophy screened: Experiencing the matrix
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy 27 (1). 2003.
    Philosophy of Film, MiscCinema
  •  167
    Comments on Appiah and Lugones
    Journal of Philosophy 87 (10): 508-509. 1990.
    Feminism: Philosophy of RaceRace and Gender
  •  65
    Philosophy & Film
    Philosophy Now 52 46-47. 2005.
    Film Media
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback