• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Hein Van Den Berg

University of Amsterdam
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    34
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    3
  •  News and Updates
    17

 More details
  • University of Amsterdam
    ILLC / Department Of Philosophy
    Assistant Professor
Vrije University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2011
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
17th/18th Century German Philosophy
Computational Philosophy
History of Biology
Conceptual Change in Science
Christian Wolff
Kant: Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Kant: Teleology
Kant: Metaphysics and Epistemology
Christian August Crusius
5 more
Areas of Interest
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
17th/18th Century German Philosophy
Computational Philosophy
History of Biology
Philosophy of Psychiatry
Conceptual Change in Science
1 more
  • All publications (34)
  •  307
    Modelling the History of Ideas
    with Arianna Betti
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (4): 812-835. 2014.
    We propose a new method for the history of ideas that has none of the shortcomings so often ascribed to this approach. We call this method the model approach to the history of ideas. We argue that any adequately developed and implementable method to trace continuities in the history of human thought, or concept drift, will require that historians use explicit interpretive conceptual frameworks. We call these frameworks models. We argue that models enhance the comprehensibility of historical text…Read more
    We propose a new method for the history of ideas that has none of the shortcomings so often ascribed to this approach. We call this method the model approach to the history of ideas. We argue that any adequately developed and implementable method to trace continuities in the history of human thought, or concept drift, will require that historians use explicit interpretive conceptual frameworks. We call these frameworks models. We argue that models enhance the comprehensibility of historical texts, and provide historians of ideas with a method that, unlike existing approaches, is susceptible neither to common holistic criticisms nor to Skinner's objections that the history of ideas yields arbitrary and biased reconstructions. To illustrate our proposal, we discuss the so-called Classical Model of Science and draw upon work in computer science and cognitive psychology.
    Philosophy of History
  •  113
    Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum
    Springer Science + Business Media. 2014.
    Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum Hein van den Berg. Parts of Chap. 2 have been previously published in Hein van den Berg (2011), “ Kant's Conception of Proper Science.” Synthese 183 (1): 7–26. Parts of Chap.
    Kant's Scientific WorkKant: Philosophy of Science
  •  56
    Bryan Wesley Hall, The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy through the Opus postumum New York and London: Routledge, 2015 Pp. x + 220 9781138802148 $145 (review)
    Kantian Review 21 (2): 329-333. 2016.
  •  37
    Kant on Vital Forces: Metaphysical concerns versus Scientific Practice
    In Ernst-Otto Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur: Ihre Entwicklung Im Opus Postumum Und Ihre Wirkung, Walter De Gruyter. pp. 115-135. 2009.
    Kant's Scientific Work, MiscKant: Teleology in ScienceKant: Metaphysics, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback